高原湖相泥炭土固结系数变化规律试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.1445

摘要
图/表
参考文献(24)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2222 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于大量室内试验结果，系统分析高原湖相泥炭土一维固结特性，探讨取样深度、固结压力p、加荷比R、加荷方式和预压荷载等因素对固结系数Cv的影响及机制。试验结果表明：泥炭土重塑和原状样Cv均满足随p增大而迅速减小之后趋于稳定的规律，和普通黏性土差异较大；经过预压的泥炭土，当预压荷载≤100 kPa时，其Cv-p关系和未预压样基本一致；预压荷载＞100 kPa时，Cv较未预压样大幅度减小，并且随着p的增大，Cv变化不大；当固结压力p＞200 kPa后，所有经过预压土样和未预压样的Cv值大小相近。分析表明：原状样结构性不显著是造成泥炭土固结特性的主要原因；固结压力作用下，泥炭土经历了从多孔隙状态至相对密实状态的转变。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	桂跃1
	余志华1
	刘海明1
	曹净1
	王兆昌2

关键词 ：土力学, 泥炭土, 一维固结系数, 预压, 渗透系数, 孔隙比

Abstract：Based on a series of test results，the one-dimensional consolidation coefficient and consolidation mechanism of plateau lacustrine peaty soil from Kunming and Dali city were studied，and some factors，such as the depth of sampling，consolidation pressure(p)，loading method， loading ratio(R) and preloading were discussed. Test results showed that the consolidation coefficients(Cv) of peaty soil decreased with increasing of consolidation pressure firstly，then reduced slowly and stably. The relationship between the consolidation pressure and the consolidation coefficients of peaty soil was a power regression. Under preloading，the consolidation coefficients of peaty soil were pretty much exactly the same as the nature sample when preloading was lower than 100 kPa. It was lower than the nature sample once the preloading was larger than 200 kPa. When consolidation pressure was larger than 200 kPa，consolidation coefficients of peaty soil changed little with consolidation pressure increased. The mechanisms of consolidation were analyzed，which caused the peculiar consolidation properties was rarely structural strength of natural peaty soil. With consolidation pressure increasing，peaty soil changed from porous to relatively dense state.

Key words： soil mechanics peaty soil consolidation coefficient pre-loading permeability coefficient void ratio

引用本文:

桂跃1，余志华1，刘海明1，曹净1，王兆昌2. 高原湖相泥炭土固结系数变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(S1): 3259-3267.
GUI Yue1，YU Zhihua1，LIU Haiming1，CAO Jing1，WANG Zhaochang2. Experimental study of the change law of consolidation coefficient of the plateau lacustrine peaty soil. , 2016, 35(S1): 3259-3267.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.1445 或 https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2016/V35/IS1/3259

[1] 吴雪婷. 温州浅滩淤泥固结系数与固结应力关系研究[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(6)：1 675–1 679.(WU Xueting. Research on elation between consolidation coefficient and consolidation stress of silt in Wenzhou shoal[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(6)：1 675–1 679. (in Chinese))

[2] 张长生，高明显，强小俊. 深圳后海湾海相淤泥固结系数变化规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2013，35(增1)：247–252.(ZHANG Changsheng，GAO Mingxian，QIANG Xiaojun. Variation laws of consolidation coefficient of marine clay in Houhai Bay of Shenzhen[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2013，35(Supp.1)：247–252.(in Chinese))

[3] 张明，赵有明，龚镭，等. 深圳湾新吹填超软土固结系数的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(增1)：3 157–3 161. (ZHANG Ming，ZHAO Youming，GONG Lei，et al. Test study of coefficient of consolidation of fresh hydraulic fill ultra-soft soil in Shenzhen Bay[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(Supp.1)：3 157–3 161.(in Chinese))

[4] 陈波，孙德安，吕海波. 海相软土压缩特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2013，34(2)：381–389.(CHEN Bo，SUN Dean，LU Haibo. Experimental study of compression behavior of marine soft clays[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2013，34(2)：381–389.(in Chinese))

[5] 庄迎春，刘世明，谢康和. 萧山软黏土一维固结系数非线性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(12)：4 565–4 569.(ZHUANG Yingchun，LIU Shiming，XIE Kanghe. Study on nonlinearity of one-dimensional consolidation coefficient of Xiaoshan clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(12)： 4 565–4 569.(in Chinese))

[6] 林鹏，许镇鸿，徐鹏，等. 软土压缩过程中固结系数的研究[J]. 岩土力学，2003，24(1)：106–112.(LIN Peng，XU Zhenhong，XU Peng，et al. Research on coefficient of consolidation of soft clay under compression[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2003，24(1)：106–112.(in Chinese))

[7] 蒋忠信. 滇池泥炭土[M]. 成都：西南交通大学出版社，1994：32–40.(JANG Zhongxin. Dianchi peaty soil[M]. Chengdu：Southwest Jiaotong University Press，1994：32–40.(in Chinese))

[8] 刘伟，赵福玉，杨文辉，等. 安嵩线草海段泥炭质土的特征及性质[J]. 岩土工程学报，2013，35(增2)：671–674.(LIU Wei，ZHAO Fuyu，YANG Wenhui，et al. Features and properties of peaty soil in Caohai section of Anning-Sonming line[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2013，35(Supp.2)：671–674.(in Chinese))

[9] 桂跃，余志华，刘海明，等. 高原湖相泥炭土次固结特性及机制分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2015，37(8)：1 390–1 398.(GUI Yue，YUE Zhihua，LIU Haiming，et al. Secondary consolidation properties and mechanism of plateau lacustrine peaty soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2015，37(8)：1 390–1 398.(in Chinese))

[10] MESRI G，AJLOUNI M. Engineering properties of fibrous peats[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2007，133(7)：850–866.

[11] 中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JTG E40—2007 公路土工试验规程[S]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2007.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People¢s Republic of China. JTG E40—2007 Test methods of soils for highway engineering[S]. Beijing：China Communication Press，2007.(in Chinese))

[12] BOBET A，HWANG J，JOHNSTON C T，et al. One-dimensional consolidation behavior of cement-treated organic soil[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2011，48(7)：1 100–1 115.

[13] ELSAYED A，PAIKOWSKY S，KURUP P. Characteristics and engineering properties of peaty soil underlying Cranberry Bogs[C]// Proceedings of Geo-Frontiers Congress 2011. Dallas，Texas，United States：[s. n.]，2011：2 812–2 821.

[14] 沈珠江. 软土工程特性和软土地基设计[J]. 岩土工程学报，1998，20(1)：100–111.(SHEN Zhujiang. Engineering properties of soft soils and design of soft ground[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1998，20(1)：100–111.(in Chinese))

[15] 邓永锋，刘松玉，季署月. 取样扰动对固结系数的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学，2007，28(12)：2 687–2 690.(DENG Yongfeng，LIU Songyu，JI Shuyue. Effect of sample disturbance on consolidation coefficient[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2007，28(12)：2 687–2 690.(in Chinese))

[16] 马驯. 固结系数与固结压力关系的统计分析及研究[J]. 港口工程，1993，(1)：46–53.(MA Xun. Statistical analysis study on the coefficient of consolidation against pressure[J]. Port Engineering，1993，(1)：46–53.(in Chinese))

[17] BURLAND J B. On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays[J]. Geotechnique，1990，40(3)：329–378.

[18] SAMSON L，LA ROCHELLE P. Design and performance of an expressway constructed over peat by preloading[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1972，9(4)：447–466.

[19] MORARESKUL N N，BRONIN V N. Consolidation of peat soils [J]. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering，1974，11(1)：55–58.

[20] HAYASHI H，MITACHI T，NISHIMOTO S. Evaluation on permeability of peat using in-situ permeability test and cementer test[C]// Proceedings of Civil Association. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2008：495–504.

[21] MESRI G，STARK T D. Secondary compression of peat with or without surcharging[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，1997，123(5)：411–421.

[22] DHOWIAN A W，EDIL T B. Consolidation behavior of peats[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal，1981，3(3)：105–114.

[23] HANRAHAN E T. An investigation of some physical properties of peat[J]. Geotechnique，1954，4(2)：108–123.

[24] WONG L S，HASHIM R，ALI F H. A review on hydraulic conductivity and compressibility of peat[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences，2009，9(18)：3 207–3 218.