基于孔压静力触探试验的土类指数共振法加固液化地基效果评价

摘要
图/表
参考文献(27)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1840 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要采用自行研制的十字形振动杆结合共振理论，对液化地基进行了加固处理。基于孔压静力触探(CPTU)试验对共振前后的地基进行测试和分析，指出传统振动密实法适用性评价标准低估了共振法的可加固土类范围。土类指数Ic可用于反映加固处理前后土层状态的改变，进而提出基于土类指数Ic的共振法适用性评价标准。根据标准贯入试验SPT钻孔取样的室内试验结果，建立土类指数Ic与黏粒含量之间的关系式，提出适合于共振法加固的土层中黏粒含量的界限值。分析不同共振方案的抗液化地基处理效果，进一步验证所提出基于土类指数评价标准的可靠性。结果表明，土类指数Ic＜2.40或黏粒含量不高于15%时土层可适合于共振法加固处理。加固方案不同，抗液化处理效果存在差异，3桩中心处理效果最好，其次为2点中心和常规点位。共振法扩展了传统振动密实法的应用局限性，可在液化地基处理领域中推广应用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	邹海峰
	蔡国军
	刘松玉
	杜广印

关键词 ：土力学, 孔压静力触探试验, 共振法, 土类指数, 液化地基

Abstract：Combined with resonance theory，improvement of liquefiable foundation with cross-shaped vibration wing is conducted. Piezocone penetration tests are performed on the foundation before and after resonance improvement. It is shown that standards to assess the applicability of traditional vibro-compaction methods are not suitable to resonance method，since silts with fine content larger than 10% can be improved by resonance method. Nevertheless，the change of soil behaviour type index Ic，represents the variation of soil properties after improvement. Therefore，a criterion based on Ic is proposed to evaluate the applicability of resonance method. With results from standard penetration test performed on samples，relationship between Ic and clay content is promoted to determine the maximum clay content in soils to ensure the applicability of resonance method. Finally，variations of improvement to reduce liquefaction potential under different resonance schemes are studied. The reliability of criterion based on Ic is further confirmed. It is concluded that cohesionless soils with Ic＜2.40 or clay content less than 15% are suitable to be improved by resonance method. However，the effects of improvement are different depending on resonance schemes. Results show that the center of three resonance columns can be improved best，nest for the center of two resonance columns and routine points respectively. It is shown that resonance method expands the limitation of traditional vibro-compaction method，and can be spreaded in liquefiable foundation improvement.

Key words： soil mechanics piezocone penetration test(CPTU) resonance method soil behavior type index liquefiable foundation

引用本文:

邹海峰，蔡国军，刘松玉，杜广印. 基于孔压静力触探试验的土类指数共振法加固液化地基效果评价[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(s2): 4105-4114.
ZOU Haifeng，CAI Guojun，LIU Songyu，DU Guangyin. EVALUATION OF RESONANCE METHOD FOR IMPROVING LIQUEFIABLE FOUNDATION BASED ON CPTU SOIL BEHAVIOR TYPE INDEX. , 2013, 32(s2): 4105-4114.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2013/V32/Is2/4105

[1]	刘松玉. 公路地基处理[M]. 南京：东南大学出版社，2009：22???-28???.(LIU Songyu. Ground improvement in highway engineering[M]. Nanjing：Southeast University Press，2009：22???-28???.(in Chinese))
[2]	中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. JGJ79—2002建筑地基处理技术规范[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2002.(The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People′s Republic of China. JGJ79—2002 Technical code for ground treatment of buildings[S]. Beijing：China Architecture and Building Press，2002.(in Chinese))
[3]	MITCHELL J K. Soil improvement-state-of-the-art[C]//Proceedingsof the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.Stockholm：[s. n.]，1982：509-565.
[4]	蔡国军. 现代数字式多功能CPTU技术理论与工程应用研究[博士学位论文][D]. 南京：东南大学，2010.(CAI Guojun. Study on theory and engineering application of digital multifunctional piezocone penetration test(CPTU)[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Nanjing：Southeast University，2010.(in Chinese))
[5]	CAI G J，LIU S Y，PUPPALA A J. Liquefaction assessments using seismic piezocone penetration(SCPTU) test investigations in Tangshan region in China[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2012，41：141-150.
[6]	蔡国军，刘松玉，童立元，等. 基于静力触探测试的国内外砂土液化判别方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(5)：1019-1027. (CAI Guojun，LIU Songyu，TONG Liyuan，et al. Evaluation of liquefaction of sandy soils based on cone penetration test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(5)：1019-1027.(in Chinese))
[7]	MASSARSCH K R. Design aspects of deep vibratory compaction[C]//Proceedings of the Seminar on Ground Improvement Methods. Hong Kong：[s. n]，1994：61-74.
[8]	LUNNE T，ROBERTSON P K，POWELL J J M. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice[M]. London：Blackie Academic and Professional，1997：???160-162???..
[9]	MASSARSCH K R. Deep Soil Compaction Using Vibratory Probes. American Society for testing and Material. ASTM，Symposium on Design，Construction，and Testing of Deep Foundation Improvement：Stone Columns and Related Techniques，Robert C. Bachus，Ed.，London，ASTM Special Technical Publication，STP 1089，Philadelphia，Deep soil compaction using vibratory probes[C]// Symposium on Design，Construction，and Testing of Deep Foundation Improvement：Stone Columns and Related Technique. Philadelphia：ASTM Special Technical Publication，STP 1089，1991：297-319.
[10]	JEFFERIES M G，DAVIES M P. Soil classification by the cone penetration test：discussion[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1991，28(1)：173-176.
[11]	JEFFERIES M G，DAVIES M P. Use of CPTU to estimate equivalent SPT N60[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal，1993，16(4)：458-468.
[12]	ROBERTSON P K，WRIDE C E. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1998，35(3)：442-459.
[13]	ROBERTSON P K.Interpretation of cone penetration tests-—a unified approach[J]. Canadian GeotechnicalJournal，2009，46(11)：1337-1355.
[14]	ROBERTSON P K. Soil classification using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1990，27(1)：151-158.
[15]	SCHNEIDER J A，RANDOLPH M F，MAYNE P W，et al.Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalizing piezocone tipresistance and pore pressure parameters[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2008，134(11)：1 569-1 586.
[16]	ESLAMI A，FELLENIUS B H. Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTUmethods applied to 102 case histories[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1997，34(6)：886-904.
[17]	SHEN S L，WANG J P，MA L.Identification of soil stratigraphy of soft deposit in Shanghai from CPTU test[C]// Proceedings of Sessions of GeoShanghai：Deep Foundations and Geotechnical in Situ Testing. Shaihai：Geotechnical Special Publication，2010：384-391.
[18]	CAI G J，LIU S Y，PUPPALA A J.Comparison of CPT charts for soil classification using PCPT data：Example from clay deposits in Jiangsu Province，China[J]. Engineering Geology，2011，121(1/2)：89-96.
[19]	BEEN K，JEFFERIES M G.Towards Systematic CPT Interpretation[C]// Proceedings of Wroth Memorial Symposium. Thomas Telford，London：[s. n.]，1992：121-134.
[20]	KU C S，JUANG C H，OU C Y.Reliability of CPT Icas an index for mechanicalbehaviour classification of soils[J]. Géotechnique，2010，60(11)：861-875.
[21]	程远，刘松玉，蔡国军. 基于CPTU测试的共振密实法加固可液化地基效果评价[J]. 东南大学学报：自然科学版，2011，41(5)：1075-1080.(CHEN Yuan，LIU Songyu，CAI Guojun. Research on effect of resonance method for reinforcing highway liquefaction foundation based on multifunctional piezocone penetration test[J]. Journal of Southeast University：Natural Science，2011，41(5)：1075-1080.(in Chinese))
[22]	HUANG A B，MA M Y.An analytical study of cone penetration tests in granular material[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，1994，31(1)：91-103.
[23]	SALGADO R.The mechanics of cone penetration：Contribution from experimental and theoretical studies[C]// Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization. ????London：Taylor &andFrancis Group????，2012：131-153.
[24]	SEED H B，IDRISS I M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division，ASCE，1971，97(9)：1249-1273.
[25]	YOUD T L，IDRISS I M. NCEER Workshopon Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils[R].Technical reportNCEER-97-0022. Buffalo，USA：National Center for Earthquake EngineeringResearch，State University of New York at Buffalo，1997.
[26]	YOUD T L，ET AL. Liquefaction resistance of soils：summaryreport from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSFworkshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J].Journal of Geotechnical and GeoenvironmentalEngineering，2001，127(10)：817-833.
[27]	ROBERTSON P K. Performance based earthquake design using the CPT[C]//International Conference on Performance-based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, . IS Tokyo. London：Taylor and&Francis Group，2009：3-20.Keynote lecture，IS-Tokyo，2009：???-???.