煤层底板岩体采动渗流场–应变场耦合分析

摘要
图/表
参考文献(24)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2107 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要根据五沟煤矿1018工作面地质及水文地质条件，应用三维快速拉格朗日(FLAC3D)流固耦合分析模块，采用变渗透系数方法，对该工作面底板岩体采动渗流应变机制进行数值模拟研究。分析结果表明：采动影响下，围岩渗透系数发生较大的变化，处在采空区正上方的泥岩段最大达到原始渗透系数的1 293倍；根据渗流场分析，工作面采动并没有破坏底板隔水层的阻水性能，采动裂隙没有导通灰岩含水层，灰岩水涌入回采工作面形成水害可能性较小；工作面正下方岩体单元安全度小于1的区域最大深度为30 m。综合渗流场以及隔水底板单元安全度分析结果，10煤底板下灰岩水溃入工作面形成水害可能性较小。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	姚多喜1
	鲁海峰2

关键词 ：采矿工程, 三维快速拉格朗日分析(FLAC3D), 流固耦合, 突水, 变渗透系数, 安全度

Abstract：Based on the geological and hydrogeological conditions of the face 1018 in Wugou coal mine，the fluid-solid coupling module in FLAC3D with changeable permeability coefficient is adopted to simulate the whole process of damage and failure of rock masses at floor of the coal seam No.10. The results indicate that the permeability coefficient of surrounding rocks changes a lot due to mining. The maximum permeability coefficient reaches 1 293 times of the original one，which happens at the immediate roof of mined-out area. According to the analysis of seepage field，mining does not destroy water resistance of floor aquifer. Mining fissures do not connect limestone aquifers，and water in the limestone is less likely to flow into stopes to cause damage. The maximum depth of rock masses with element safety degree less than one is about 30 m. According to the change of permeability coefficient of and the analytical results of element safety degree of rock masses，safe mining of the face 1018 can be ensured.

Key words： mining engineering fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in three dimensions(FLAC3D) fluid-solid coupling water inrush changeable permeability coefficient safety degree

引用本文:

姚多喜1，鲁海峰2. 煤层底板岩体采动渗流场–应变场耦合分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(S1): 2738-2744.
YAO Duoxi1，LU Haifeng2. SEEPAGE FIELD-STRAIN FIELD COUPLING ANALYSIS FOR ROCK MASSES OF coal SEAM FLOOR DURING MINING ABOVE A CONFINED AQUIFER. , 2012, 31(S1): 2738-2744.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2012/V31/IS1/2738

[1] 仵彦卿，张倬元. 岩体水力学导论[M]. 成都：西南交通大学出版社，1995：2–6.(WU Yanqing，ZHANG Zhuoyuan. An introduction to rock mass hydraulics[M]. Chengdu：Southwest Jiaotong University Press，1995：2–6.(in Chinese))

[2] 虎维岳. 矿山水害防治理论与方法[M]. 北京：煤炭工业出版社，2005：72–76.(HU Weiyue. Theory and method of mine water hazard control[M]. Beijing：China Coal Industry Publishing House，2005：72–76.(in Chinese))

[3] 周笑绿，杨国勇，郑世书. 东滩矿3 煤顶板突水的影响因素[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2006，23(3)：281–284，288.(ZHOU Xiaolu，YANG Guoyong，ZHENG Shishu. Influencing factors on water burst in the roof of seam No.3 in Dongtan coal mine[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering，2006，23(3)：281–284，288.(in Chinese))

[4] 魏久传，李白英. 承压水上采煤安全性评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2000，28(4)：57–59.(WEI Jiuchuan，LI Baiying. Security evaluation of coal mining above the confined aquifers[J]. Coal Geology and Exploration，2000，28(4)：57–59.(in Chinese))

[5] 王作宇，刘鸿泉. 承压水上采煤[M]. 北京：煤炭工业出版社， 1993：132–137.(WANG Zuoyu，LIU Hongquan. Coal mining above confined aquifer[M]. Beijing：China Coal Industry Publishing House，1993：132–137.(in Chinese))

[6] 杨天鸿，唐春安，朱万成，等. 岩石破裂过程渗流与应力耦合分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2001，23(4)：489–493.(YANG Tianhong，TANG Chun¢an，ZHU Wancheng，et al. Coupling analysis of seepage and stresses in rock failure process[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2001，23(4)：489–493.(in Chinese))

[7] 林杭，曹平，宫凤强. 位移突变判据中监测点的位置和位移方式分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2007，29(9)：1 433–1 438.(LIN Hang，CAO Ping，GONG Fengqiang. Analysis of locations and displacement modes of monitoring points in displacement mutation criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2007，29(9)：1 433– 1 438.(in Chinese))

[8] 沈金瑞，林杭. 多组节理边坡稳定性FLAC^3D数值分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报，2007，17(1)：29–33.(SHEN Jinrui，LIN Hang. The numerical analysis of the stability of slope with several sets of joints by FLAC^3D[J]. China Safety Science Journal，2007，17(1)：29–33.(in Chinese))

[9] 王贵成，曹平，林杭，等. 用灰色理论确定边坡最优监测点及安全系数[J]. 中南大学学报：自然科学版，2007，38(3)：574–578.(WANG Guicheng，CAO Ping，LIN Hang，et al. Determination of optimum monitoring point of slope and safety factor using grey system theory[J]. Journal of Central South University：Science and Technology，2007，38(3)：574–578.(in Chinese))

[10] CHARLEZ P A. Rock mechanics：petroleum applications[M]. Paris：Technical Publisher，1991：37–39.

[11] SOULEY M，HOMAND F，PEPA S，et al. Damage-induced permeability changes in granite：a case example at the URL in Canada[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2001，38(2)：297–310.

[12] WANG J A，PARK H D. Fluid permeability of sedimentary rocks in a complete stress-strain process[J]. Engineering Geology，2002，63(3)：291–300.

[13] 彭苏萍，孟召平，王虎，等. 不同围压下砂岩孔渗规律试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2003，22(5)：742–746.(PENG Suping，MENG Zhaoping，WANG Hu，et al. Experimental study on pore ratio and permeability of sandstone under different confining pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2003，22(5)：742–746.(in Chinese))

[14] 李世平，李玉寿，吴振业. 岩石全应力–应变过程对应的渗透率–应变方程[J]. 岩土工程学报，1995，17(2)：13–19.(LI Shiping，LI Yushou，WU Zhenye. The permeability-strain equations related to complete stress-strain path of the rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1995，17(2)：13–19.(in Chinese))

[15] 朱珍德，张爱军，徐卫亚. 脆性岩石全应力–应变过程渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2002，23(5)：555–558，563.(ZHU Zhende，ZHANG Aijun，XU Weiya. Experimental research on complete stress-strain process seepage characteristic of brittle rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2002，23(5)：555–558，563.(in Chinese))

[16] ELSWORTH D，BAI M. Flow-deformation response of dual-porosity media[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1992，118(1)：107–124.

[17] STORMONT J C，DAEMEN J J K. Laboratory study of gas permeability changes in rock salt during deformation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1992，29(4)：323–342.

[18] SALAMON M D G. Mechanism of caving in longwall coal mining[C]// HUSTRULID W，JOHNSON G A ed. Proceedings of the 31st US Symposium on Rock Mechanics Contributions and Challenges. Denver，USA：A.A. Balkema，1990：161–168.

[19] PAPPAS D M. Behavior of simulated longwall gob material[R]. Washington，D. C.：United States Department of the Interior，Bureau of Mines，1993：1–39.

[20] 隋旺华，董青红. 近松散层开采孔隙水压力变化及其对水砂突涌的前兆意义[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(9)：1 908–1 916. (SUI Wanghua，DONG Qinghong. Variation of pore water pressure and its precursor significance for quicksand disasters due to mining near unconsolidated formations[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(9)：1 908–1 916.(in Chinese))

[21] HOEK E，BRAY J. Rock slope engineering[M]. London：The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy，1981：45–48.

[22] 中国电力企业联合会标准化部. 电力工业标准汇编——水电卷，水工：上册[M]. 北京：水利电力出版社，1995：98–102.(China Electricity Council Standardization. Compiles of power industry standards—hydropower，hydraulic engineering(vol.1)[M]. Beijing：Water Resources and Electric Power Press，1995：98–102.(in Chinese))

[23] 沈可，张仲卿. 三维抗滑稳定分析中的点安全系数法[J]. 人民珠江，2003，(2)：21–22.(SHEN Ke，ZHANG Zhongqing. Point safety factor method for three-dimensional stability analysis[J]. Pearl River，2003，(2)：21–22.(in Chinese))

[24] 蓝航. 基于FLAC^3D的边坡单元安全度分析及应用[J]. 中国矿业大学学报，2008，37(4)：570–574.(LAN Hang. Analysis of zone safety degree of slopes and its application based on FLAC^3D[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，2008，37(4)： 570–574.(in Chinese))