|
|
|
| Study on the failure mechanisms of counter-tilt rock slopes with layered cataclastic structure |
| YAO Ye1，ZHANG Guangcheng1，CHEN Hongjie2，WANG Mingfei1，BAO Liulei1，CHANG Zheng1 |
| (1. School of Engineering，China University of Geosciences(Wuhan)，Wuhan，Hubei 430071，China；2. Huaneng Lancang River Hydropower Inc，Kunming，Yunnan 650214，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Counter-tilt rock slopes are a kind of rock slopes in the construction of large-scale water conservancy projects，highway(railway) projects and mine projects in China. In this paper，the whole process of deformation and failure of a rock slope with a set of joints orthogonal to the stratums is studied by means of the base friction model test. The slope deformation characteristics such as macro deformation，rock displacement，rock bending angle are analyzed to reveal the failure mechanism and the spatial force evolution law of the failure process，and the deformation zones of the counter-tilt rock slopes with layered cataclastic structure are divided. The test results show that the failure modes of the counter-tilt rock slopes with layered cataclastic structure include tensile-toppling，tensile-slip toppling and flexural tensile-(slip) toppling according to deformation and failure characterizes. The slope is divided into stable，(flexural-)tensile-toppling，compression cracking and (slippling-) toppling，and shear-slippling zones. When the slope angle or the dip angle is large，the shear-slipping zone does not exist. With increasing the slope angle，the failure of the slope body is gradually rapid，the first broken part transfers from the middle to the top of the slope，and the flexural characteristics of the rock stratums gradually decrease during the failure process；Models with a certain slope angle and a smaller dip angle are easier to deform and prone to slip along the fracture planes，while those with a larger slope angle or a larger dip angle are prone to tensile toppling failure. The deformation of the rock stratums in different parts of the slope are out-of-step，and the deformation rule conforms with the three-stage development of creep characteristics. The deformation rate is basically in horizontal orientation when the tensile deformation begins and then becomes apparent in vertical orientation after the topping failure happens，which can be taken as a judgment of the initial deformation stage. The maximum bending angle of the rock stratums which are dominated by tensile-toppling failure is obviously smaller，and the fracture planes are ladder-like. The maximum bending angle and the failure depth of the rock stratums dominated by flexural tensile-(slip) toppling are obviously larger，and the fracture planes are mostly straight line or irregular broken line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] ASHBY J. Sliding and toppling modes of failure in models and jointed rock slopes[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. London：University of London，Imperial College，1971.
[2] GOODMAN R E. Toppling of rock slope[C]// Specialty Conference on Rock Engineering for Foundations and Slopes. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1976：201–234.
[3] HOEK E，BRAY J. Rock slope engineering[M]. London：The Institute of Mining and Metallurgy，1981：1–456.
[4] BROWN A. Toppling induced movements in large，relatively flat rock slopes[C]// The 23rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. California，USA：American Rock Mechanics Association，Berkeley，1982.
[5] STEWART D P，ADHIKARY D P，JEWELL R J. Studies on the stability of model rock slopes[C]// International Conference Centrifuge 94. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1994：629–634.
[6] 汪小刚，贾志欣，陈祖煜. 岩石边坡的倾倒破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. 水利学报，1996，(3)：7–12.(WANG Xiaogang，JIA Zhixin，CHEN Zuyu. Stability analysis method of toppling failure of rock slope[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering，1996，(3)：7–12.(in Chinese))
[7] CHEN Z Y，GONG W J，MA G W，et al. Comparisons between centrifuge and numerical modeling results for slope toppling failure[J]. Science China：Technological Sciences，2015，58(9)：1 497–1 508.
[8] ADHIKARY D P，DYSKIN A V. Modelling of progressive and instantaneous failures of foliated rock slopes[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2007，40(4)：349–362.
[9] SOTO C A. A comprehensive study of slope modelling technique for fractured ground[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. London：London University. Imperial Colleage，1974.
[10] AMINI M，GOLAMZADEH M，KHOSRAVI M. Physical and theoretical modeling of rock slopes against block-flexure toppling failure[J]. International Journal of Mining and Geo-engineering，2015，49(2)：155–171.
[11] AMINI M，SARFARAZ H，ESMAEILI K. Stability analysis of slopes with a potential of slide-head-toppling failure[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2018，112：108–121.
[12] ALEJANO L R，SÁNCHEZ-ALONSO C，PÉREZ-REY I，et al. Block toppling stability in the case of rock blocks with rounded edges[J]. Engineering Geology，2018，234：192–203.
[13] 郑 达，王沁沅，毛 峰，等. 反倾层状岩质边坡深层倾倒变形关键致灾因子及成灾模式的离心试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2019，38(10)：1 954–1 963.(ZHENG Da，WANG Qinyuan，MAO Feng，et al. Centrifuge model test study on the key hazard factor of deep toppling deformation and disaster pattern of counter-tilt layered rock slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2019，38(10)：1 954–1 963.(in Chinese))
[14] WHYTE R J. A study of progressive hanging wall caving at Chambishi copper mine in Zambia using the base friction model concept[R]. London：Imperial College，London University，1973.
[15] BRAY J W，GOODMAN R E. The theory of base friction models[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts，1981：18：53–468.
[16] 冯文凯，石豫川，柴贺军，等. 缓倾角层状高边坡变形破坏机制物理模拟研究[J]. 中国公路学报，2004，17(2)：33–37.(FENG Wenkai，SHI Yuchuang，CAI Hejun，et al. Study of mechanism of deformation failure of a low-angle bedded high slope with physical simulation[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport，2004，17(2)：33–37.(in Chinese))
[17] 蔡国军，黄润秋，严 明，等. 反倾向边坡开挖变形破裂响应的物理模拟研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(4)：811–817.(CAI Guojun，HUANG Runqiu，YAN Ming，et al. Physical modeling research on consequent antidip rock slope induced by slope excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(4)：811–817.(in Chinese))
[18] 龚召熊，郭春茂，高大水. 地质力学模型材料试验研究[J]. 长江水利水电科学研究院院报，1984，1(1)：32–46.(GONG Zhaoxiong，GUO Chunmao，GAO Dashui. Experimental research on geomechanics model materials[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Water Resources and Hydropower Research Institute，1984，1(1)：32–46.(in Chinese))
[19] 王汉鹏，李术才，张强勇，等. 新型地质力学模型试验相似材料的研制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2006，25(9)：1 842–1 847.(WANG Hanpeng，LI Shucai，ZHANG Qiangyong，et al. Development of a new geomechanical similar material[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2006，25(9)：1 842–1 847.(in Chinese))
[20] 宁奕冰，唐辉明，张勃成，等. 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学，2020，41(6)： 2 009–2 020.(NING Yibing，TANG Huiming，ZHANG Bocheng，et al. Research on rock similar material proportioning test based on orthogonal design and its application in base friction physical model test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2020，41(6)：2 009–2 020.(in Chinese))
[21] 陈祖煜，汪小刚，杨 健. 岩质边坡稳定分析：原理·方法·程序[M]. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，2005：64–73.(CHEN Zuyu，WANG Xiaogang，YANG Jian. Stability analysis of rock slope：Principle·Method·Procedure[M]. Beijing：China Water and Power Press，2005：64–73.(in Chinese))
[22] 程东幸，刘大安，丁恩保，等. 层状反倾岩质边坡影响因素及反倾条件分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2005，27(11)：127–131.(CHENG Dongxin，LIU Daan，DING Enbao，et al. Analysis on influential factors and toppling conditions of toppling rock slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2005，27(11)：127–131.(in Chinese))
[23] 位 伟，段绍辉，姜清辉，等. 反倾边坡影响倾倒稳定的几种因素探讨[J]. 岩土力学，2008，29(增1)：431–434.(WEI Wei，DUAN Shaohui，JIANG Qinghui，et al. Research on some factors influencing the toppling stability in anti-inclined slope[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2008，29(Supp.1)：431–434.(in Chinese))
[24] 黄润秋，李渝生，严 明. 斜坡倾倒变形的工程地质分析[J]. 工程地质学报，2017，25(5)：1 165–1 181.(HUANG Runqiu，LI Yusheng，YAN Ming. The implication and evaluation of toppling failure in engineering geology practice[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology，2017，25(5)：1 165–1 181.(in Chinese)) |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 40 
