双剪统一边界面塑性本构模型的有限差分算法及其数值验证

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2022.0124

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (33297 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The twin shear unified bounding surface plasticity model(BUST model) can capture the plastic strain accumulation of geomaterials in small deviatoric stress state，which can?t be well predicted by classical twin shear unified elastoplastic constitutive model(UST model). To apply the BUST model in analyzing static and dynamic response of slopes or landslides，its finite difference format is formulated and compiled，and its reliability is further analyzed using numerical simulation. Firstly，the finite difference format of the BUST model is formulated both in general stress space and principal stress space. Specifically，the mathematical form of bounding surface，loading surface，mapping rule variable，plastic multiplier，plastic correction，and corner singularity treatment are derived. Secondly，the finite difference format of BUST model is compiled using C++ language，and its dynamic link library file is generated. Finally，a list of numerical simulation is conducted using FLAC3D software including a unit test for comparing BUST model and UST model，a triaxial compression test for predicting the stress-strain relationship of soft rock，a loess-mudstone slope simulation for predicting acceleration response. The results indicate that the finite difference method of the BUST model is reliable，and it can be applied in analyzing static and dynamic response of slopes or landslides.

Key words： slope engineering unified strength theory bounding surface plasticity constitutive model FLAC3D numerical simulation

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	KANG Xiaosen1
	LIAO Hongjian2
	HUANG Qiangbing1
	WANG Zuochen1
	MA Zongyuan3

Cite this article:

KANG Xiaosen1,LIAO Hongjian2,HUANG Qiangbing1, et al. Finite difference method of a twin shear unified bounding surface plasticity model and its numerical validation[J]. , 2023, 42(1): 65-75.

URL:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2022.0124 OR https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/EN/Y2023/V42/I1/65

[1]	YU M H. Advances in strength theories for materials under complex stress state in the 20th century[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews，2002，55(3)：169–218.
[2]	YU M H. Twin shear stress yield criterion[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences，1983，25(1)：71–74.
[3]	YU M H. Unified strength theory and its applications[M]. 2nd ed. Singapore：Springer，2018：221–226.
[4]	MA Z Y，LIAO H J，DANG F N. Unified elastoplastic finite difference and its application[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics，2013，34(4)：457–474.
[5]	MA Z Y，LIAO H J，DANG F N. Effect of intermediate principal stress on flat-ended punch problems[J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics，2014，84(2)：277–289.
[6]	MA Z Y，LIAO H J，DANG F N. Influence of intermediate principal stress on the bearing capacity of strip and circular footings[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics，2014，140(7)：04014041.
[7]	DENG L S，FAN W，YIN Y P，et al. Parametric study of the unified strength theory for a loess foundation supporting a strip footing[J]. Environmental Geology，2019，78(12)：344.1–344.14.
[8]	DENG L S，FAN W，YU M H. Parametric study of a loess slope based on unified strength theory[J]. Engineering Geology，2018，233：98–110.
[9]	王俊奇，陆峰. 统一强度理论模型嵌入ABAQUS软件及在隧道工程中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报，2010，27(2)：68–74.(WANG Junqi，LU Feng. Unified strength theory constitutive model embedded software ABAQUS and its application in tunnel engineering[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute，2010，27(2)：68–74.(in Chinese))
[10]	ZHANG C G，ZHAO J H，ZHANG Q H，et al. A new closed-form solution for circular openings modeled by the unified strength theory and radius-dependent Young's modulus[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2012，42：118–128.
[11]	张常光，范文，赵均海. 非饱和土统一强度理论及真三轴试验结果验证[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(8)：1 702–1 711. (ZHANG Changguang，FAN Wen，ZHAO Junhai. Unified strength theory of unsaturated soils and verification with true triaxial test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(8)：1 702–1 711.(in Chinese))
[12]	LI H Z，LIAO H J，XIONG G D，et al. A three-dimensional statistical damage constitutive model for geomaterials[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology，2015，29(1)：71–77.
[13]	SHEN P W，TANG H M，WANG D J，et al. A statistical damage constitutive model based on unified strength theory for embankment rocks[J]. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology，2020，38(7)：818–829.
[14]	DAFALIAS Y F. Bounding surface plasticity. I：mathematical foundation and hypoplasticity[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics，1986，112(9)：966–987.
[15]	XIAO Y，SUN Z C，STUEDLEIN A W，et al. Bounding surface plasticity model for stress-strain and grain-crushing behaviors of rockfill materials[J]. Geoscience Frontiers，2020，11(2)：495–510.
[16]	XIAO H W，LEE FH，LIU Y. Bounding surface Cam-Clay model with cohesion for cement-admixed clay[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2017，17(1)：04016026.
[17]	SEIDALINOV G，TAIEBAT M. Bounding surface SANICLAY plasticity model for cyclic clay behavior[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics，2014，38(7)：702–724.
[18]	WOO S I，SALGADO R. Bounding surface modeling of sand with vonsideration of fabric and its evolution during monotonic shearing[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures，2014，63(2015)：277–288.
[19]	MASOUMI H，DOUGLAS K J，RUSSELL A R. A bounding surface plasticity model for intact rock exhibiting size-dependent behaviour[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2016，49(1)：47–62.
[20]	RAHIMI M，CHAN D，NOURI A. Bounding surface constitutive model for cemented sand under monotonic loading[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2016，16(2)：1–11.
[21]	ZHANG W Y，LIM K W，GHAHARI S F，et al. On the implementation and validation of a three‐dimensional pressure‐dependent bounding surface plasticity model for soil nonlinear wave propagation and soil-structure interaction analyses[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics，2021，45(8)：1 091–1 119.
[22]	KANG X S，LIAO H J，LENG X L. An enhanced bounding surface plasticity model for soft rock subjected to drained and undrained condition[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2020，127(2020)：103742.
[23]	周翠英，邓毅梅，谭祥韶，等. 饱水软岩力学性质软化的试验研究与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(1)：33–38.(ZHOU Cuiying，DENG Yimei，TAN Xiangshao，et al. Experimental research on the softening of mechanical properties of saturated soft rocks and application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(1)：33–38.(in Chinese))
[24]	雷小芹，杨果林. 边界面模型在FLAC3D中的开发及验证[J]. 岩土力学，2012，33(2)：635–640.(LEI Xiaoqing，YANG Guolin. Development and verification of bounding surface model in FLAC3D[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2012，33(2)：635–640.(in Chinese))
[25]	柳军修，尹振宇，杨杰，等. 结构性黏土边界面模型在FLAC3D中的开发及隧道施工数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(6)：1 277–1 286.(LIU Junxiu，YIN Zhenyu，YANG Jie，et al. Implementation of a bounding surface model of structured clays in FLAC3D and numerical simulation of tunnel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(6)：1 277–1 286.(in Chinese))
[26]	王春波，丁文其，乔亚飞. 硬化土本构模型在FLAC3D中的开发及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(1)：199–208.(WANG Chunbo，DING Wenqi，QIAO Yafei. Development and application of hardening soil constitutive model in FLAC3D[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(1)：199–208.(in Chinese))
[27]	FU Y K，IWATAB M，DING W Q，et al. An elastoplastic model for soft sedimentary rock considering inherent anisotropy and confining-stress dependency[J]. Soils and Foundation，2012，25(4)：575–589.
[28]	贾向宁，黄强兵，王涛，等. 陡倾顺层断裂带黄土–泥岩边坡动力响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(12)：2 721–2 732.(JIA Xiangning，HUANG Qiangbing，WANG tao，et al. Shaking table test of dynamic responses of loess-mudstone slopes with a steep dip bedding fault zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(12)：2 721–2 732.(in Chinese))
[29]	HUANG Q B，JIA X N，PENG J B，et al. Seismic response of loess-mudstone slope with bedding fault zone[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2019，123：371–380.