恒定法向刚度边界条件下三维粗糙节理面循环剪切力学特性

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.1128

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3975 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要通过开展恒定法向刚度边界条件下三维粗糙节理面循环剪切试验，揭示法向刚度(0～7 GPa/m)和循环剪切次数(1～10次)对节理面剪切应力、法向变形、法向应力、剪切应力路径、表面阻力指数、声发射响应和表面磨损特征的影响。试验结果表明：剪切应力–剪切位移路径具有典型的刚度依赖特征，当法向刚度较小时，剪切应力在初始峰值之后逐渐减小，呈现应力软化行为；随着法向刚度的增加，法向位移增加幅度逐渐减小，而由剪切引起的剪切应力与法向应力增加幅度均逐渐变大，呈现应力硬化特征。当循环次数 = 1时，随着法向刚度由3 GPa/m增加至7 GPa/m，节理面表观黏聚力和表观内摩擦角分别增加了22.40%和26.84%，而表面阻力指数基本保持稳定。随着循环次数的增加，初始剪切应力峰值逐渐降低，且降低幅度逐渐变缓并最终趋于稳定，其中在循环次数从1增加到2时，初始剪切应力峰值降低幅度最大(24.93%～60.91%)；循环剪切过程中，由于节理表面凸起被磨损剪断并趋于光滑，剪胀变形及法向应力增加幅度均逐渐降低；当剪切位移较大时，与法向应力相比，剪切应力增加幅度衰减更为敏感，表面阻力指数逐渐增加。累积声发射能量随着循环次数的增加逐渐减小，而随着法向刚度从0.5 GPa/m增加至7 GPa/m，稳定阶段累积声发射能量增加了229.8%，剪切磨损面积占比增加了72.02%～97.11%。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘日成1
	2
	尹乾1
	2
	杨瀚清1
	靖洪文1
	蒋宇静2
	蔚立元1

关键词 ：岩石力学, 恒定法向刚度, 循环剪切, 节理面, 剪胀变形, 声发射, 二值化

Abstract：In this study，the effects of the normal stiffness(0–7 GPa/m) and the number of cyclic shearing(1–10) on the shear stress，normal deformation，normal stress，shear stress path，surface resistance index，acoustic emission responses and surface wear characteristics of joint surfaces were revealed through conducting cyclic shear tests on 3D rough joint surfaces under constant normal stiffness(CNS) boundary conditions. The experimental results indicate that the shear stress-shear displacement path exhibits typical normal stiffness-dependent characteristics. When the normal stiffness is small，the shear stress declines gradually after the initial peak value，showing a stress softening behavior. With increasing the normal stiffness，the increase extent of the normal displacement declines gradually，while the increase extents of both shear-induced shear stress and normal stress present a gradual increase，characterized by a stress hardening behavior. When the number of cyclic shearing is 1，with an increase of the normal stiffness from 3 GPa/m to 7 GPa/m，the apparent cohesion and apparent internal friction angle of the joint surfaces increase by 22.40% and 26.84%，respectively，while the surface resistance index remains generally stable. With continuous increasing the number of cyclic shearing，the initial peak shear stress declines gradually，while the decrease extent becomes slow down and gradually stabilizes. Especially，the decrease extent of the initial peak shear stress experiences the largest reduction(24.93%–60.91%) with increasing the number of cyclic shearing from 1 to 2. During the cyclic shear process，due to cutting and wearing of the asperities，the joint surfaces tend to be smooth，resulting in gradual reduction of the increase extents of both the dilatancy deformation and the normal stress. When the shear displacement is larger，compared with the normal stress，the attenuation of the increase extent of the shear stress is more sensitive and the surface resistance index increases gradually. The cumulative acoustic emission energy declines with the number of cyclic shearing. However，while the normal stiffness increases from 0.5 GPa/m to 7 GPa/m，the cumulative acoustic emission energy in the stable stage shows an increase by a factor of 2.298，and the ratio of the shear area increases by 72.02%–97.11%.

Key words： rock mechanics constant normal stiffness(CNS) cyclic shear joint surface dilatancy acoustic emission binaryzation

引用本文:

刘日成1，2，尹乾1，2，杨瀚清1，靖洪文1，蒋宇静2，蔚立元1. 恒定法向刚度边界条件下三维粗糙节理面循环剪切力学特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(6): 1092-1109.
LIU Richeng1，2，YIN Qian1，2，YANG Hanqing1，JING Hongwen1，JIANG Yujing2，YU Liyuan1. Cyclic shear mechanical properties of 3D rough joint surfaces under constant normal stiffness(CNS) boundary conditions. , 2021, 40(6): 1092-1109.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.1128 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/I6/1092

[3]	宋宇，刘保国，任大瑞，等. 基于分形理论构建随机粗糙节理模型的方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2021，40(1)：101-112.(SONG Yu，LIU Baoguo，REN Darui，et al. Study on stochastic method for the modeling of rough joints based on fractal theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2021，40(1)：101-112.(in Chinese))
[13]	INDRARATNA B，HAQUE A，AZIZ N. Shear behaviour of idealized infilled joints under constant normal stiffness[J]. Géotechnique，1999，49(3)：331-355.
[23]	HAN G S，JING H，JIANG Y，et al. Effect of cyclic loading on the shear behaviours of both unfilled and infilled rough rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2020，53：31-57.
[33]	FANG Y，ELSWORTH D，WANG C，et al. Frictional stability- permeability relationships for fractures in shales[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research：Solid Earth，2017，122：1 760-1 776.
[11]	JOHNSTON I W，LAM T S K，WILLIAMS A F. Constant normal stiffness direct shear testing for socketed pile design in weak rock[J]. Géotechnique，1987，37(1)：83-89.
[21]	MIRZAGHORBANALI A，NEMCIK J，AZIZ N. Effects of shear rate on cyclic loading shear behaviour of rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2014，47(5)：1 931-1 938.
[31]	JIANG Q，YANG B，YAN F，et al. New method for characterizing the shear damage of natural rock joint based on 3D engraving and 3D scanning[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2020，20(2)：06019022.
[7]	BARTON N，CHOUBEY V. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics，1977，10(1/2)：1-54.
[1]	周辉，孟凡震，张传庆，等. 结构面剪切破坏特性及其在滑移型岩爆研究中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2015，34(9)：1 729-1 738.(ZHOU Hui，MENG Fanzhen，ZHANG Chuanqing，et al. Characteristics of shear failure of structural plane and slip rockburst[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2015，34(9)：1 729-1 738.(in Chinese))
[4]	何刘，赵志明，吴光，等. 岩体结构面表面形态剪切弱化行为特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2020，41(增2)，doi：10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1829. (HE Liu，ZHAO Zhiming，WU Guang，et al. Shear weakening behavior at the surface of structural plane of rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2020，41(Supp.2)，doi：10.16285/j.rsm. 2019.1829.(in Chinese))
[5]	INDRARATNA B，THIRUKUMARAN S，BROWN E T，et al. Modelling the shear behaviour of rock joints with asperity damage under constant normal stiffness[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2015，48(1)：179-195.
[9]	OH J，CORDING E J，MOON T. A joint shear model incorporating small-scale and largescale irregularities[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2015，76：78-87.
[14]	JIANG Y J，XIAO J，TANABASHI Y，et al. Development of an automated servo-controlled direct shear apparatus applying a constant normal stiffness condition[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2004，41(2)：275-286.
[15]	JIANG Y J，LI B，TANABASHI Y. Estimating the relation between surface roughness and mechanical properties of rock joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2006，43(6)：837-846.
[17]	夏才初，钱鑫，桂洋，等. 多功能岩石节理全剪切-渗流耦合试验系统研制与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(10)：16-28.(XIA Caichu，QIAN Xin，GUI Yang，et al. A novel multi-functional shear-flow coupled test system for rock joints and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(10)：16-28.(in Chinese))
[2]	班力壬，戚承志，薛耀东，等. 基于3D打印技术复制砂浆节理的剪切试验及峰值抗剪强度模型[J]. 煤炭学报，2020，45(2)：643-650.(BAN Liren，QI Chengzhi，XUE Yaodong，et al. A model for estimating the peak shear strength of rock joints based on 3D quantified surface description[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2020，45(2)：643-650.(in Chinese))
[12]	LIU R，LOU S，LI X，et al. Anisotropic surface roughness and shear behavior of rough-walled plaster joints under constant normal load and constant normal stiffness conditions[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2020，12：338-352.
[19]	BELEM T，SOULEY M，HOMAND F. Modeling surface roughness degradation of rock joint wall during monotonic and cyclic shearing[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2007，2(4)：227-248.
[22]	MIRZAGHORBANALI A，NEMCIK J，AZIZ N. Effects of cyclic loading on the shear behaviour of infilled rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2014，47(4)：1 373-1 391.
[24]	LEE Y，PARK J，SONG J. Model for the shear behavior of rock joints under CNL and CNS conditions[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2014，70：252-263.
[25]	崔国建，张传庆，韩华超，等. CNL及CNS条件下结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2019，38(增2)：3 384-3 392. (CUI Guojian，ZHANG Chuanqing，HAN Huachao，et al. Experiment study on shear behavior of artificial joint under CNL and CNS boundary conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2019，38(Supp.2)：3 384-3 392.(in Chinese))
[27]	YIN Q，LIU R C，JING H W，et al. Experimental study of nonlinear flow behaviors through fractured rock samples after high-temperature exposure[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2019，52：2 963-2 983.
[29]	尹乾，靖洪文，孟波，等. 恒定法向刚度条件下三维粗糙裂隙面剪切力学特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2020，39(11)：2 213-2 225.(YIN Qian，JING Hongwen，MENG Bo，et al. Shear mechanical properties of 3D rough rock fracture surfaces under constant normal stiffness conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2020，39(11)：2 213-2 225.(in Chinese))
[32]	INDRARATNA B，HAQUE A，AZIZ N. Laboratory modelling of shear behaviour of soft joints under constant normal stiffness conditions[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering，1998，16：17-44.
[34]	MENG F，WONG L N Y，ZHOU H，et al. Shear rate effects on the post-peak shear behaviour and acoustic emission characteristics of artificially split granite joints[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2019，52：2 155-2 174.
[6]	THIRUKUMARAN S，INDRARATNA B. A review of shear strength models for rock joints subjected to constant normal stiffness[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2016，8(3)：405-414.
[8]	JING L，STEPHANSSON O，NORDLUND E. Study of rock joints under cyclic loading conditions[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，1993，26(3)：215-232.
[10]	XIONG X，LI B，JIANG Y，et al. Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2011，48(8)：1 292-1 302.
[16]	蒋宇静，王刚，李博，等. 岩石节理剪切渗流耦合试验及分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(11)：2 253-2 259.(JIANG Yujing，WANG Gang，LI Bo，et al. Experimental study and analysis of shear-flow coupling behaviors of rock joints[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(11)：2 253-2 259.(in Chinese))
[18]	BELEM T，HOMAND-ETIENNE F，SOULEY M. Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2000，33(4)：217-242.
[20]	BELEM T，SOULEY M，HOMAND F. Method for quantification of wear of sheared joint walls based on surface morphology[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2009，42(6)：883-910.
[26]	LI Y C，WU W，LI B. An analytical model for two?order asperity degradation of rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2018，51：1 431-1 445.
[28]	ISRM. Rock characterization，testing and monitoring-ISRM suggested methods[C]// Suggested Methods for the Quantitative Description of Discontinuities in Rock Masses. Pergamon，Oxford：[s. n.]，1981：3-52.
[30]	HUANG N，LIU R，JIANG Y，et al. E?ects of fracture surface roughness and shear displacement on geometrical and hydraulic properties of three-dimensional crossed rock fracture models[J]. Advances in Water Resources，2018，113：30-41.