Particle size effect investigation on soil arching in sands
HAO Shuai1, LUO Weiping2, ZHENG Zaidi3, XUE Dongjie4, LIU Xueyan1*
(1.Department of Civil Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Beijing Municipal No.4 Engineering Construction
Co., Ltd., Beijing 100045, China; 4. State Key Laboratory for Tunnel Engineering,
China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract：The soil arching effect is a crucial factor to consider in tunnel excavation, bridge pile foundations, slope cutting, and other construction projects. It is influenced by factors such as trapdoor width, soil cover depth, and soil strength. However, particle size also plays a significant role in the soil arching effect and requires further investigation. This study employs cubic and hexagonal particle packing models and utilizes the discrete element method to explore the evolution of the soil arching effect under plane strain conditions for single-sized sand in both loose and dense states. The study analyses the regulatory mechanisms of particle size on the ground reaction curve, shear band shape, loosening zone range and shape, and the contact force network.
Results suggest that: (1) under the same conditions, the maximum normalized arch stress, ultimate normalized stress, and maximum normalized arch displacement decrease with increasing particle size; (2) the shear band shape varies with particle size: large and medium-sized particles (d = 3–6 mm) induce tower-like shear failure above the trapdoor, while smaller particles (d = 1 mm) exhibit more complex failure due to the interaction of horizontal and triangular shear bands; (3) regarding the loosening zone, dense sand with large particles (d = 6 mm) displays only a triangular loosening zone, whereas medium and small particles (d = 1–3 mm) show both triangular loosening and inward-contracting funnel-shaped settlement. In contrast, loose sand tends to fail over a larger area, exhibiting a contracting funnel-shaped loosening pattern; (4) as particle size decreases, the average contact force between particles diminishes, while contact density increases. The reduction in contact force weakens the efficiency of load transmission between particles, which is not conducive to the formation of the soil arch, whereas the increase in contact density enhances the cohesiveness of the soil, allowing more particles to contribute to the evolution of the soil arch.
[1] TERZAGHI K. Stress distribution in dry and in saturated sand above a yielding trap-door[C]// 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. [S.l.]：[s. n.]，1936: 307–311.
[2] TERZAGHI K. Theoretical soil mechanics[M]. New York：John Wiley and Sons，Ltd.，1943：66–76.
[3] HANDY R L. The arch in soil arching[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，1985，111(3)：302–318.
[4] 刘杰锋，曹海莹，王优群，等. 考虑土拱效应的黏性土主动土压力解析解[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报，2023，20(12)：4 604–4 612. (LIU Jiefeng，CAO Haiying，WANG Youqun，et al. Analytical solution of active earth pressure considering soil arching for cohesive soil[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering，2023，20(12)：4 604–4 612.(in Chinese))
[5] 芮 瑞，贺世开，刘 浩，等. 基于混合试验的桩承式加筋路堤参数影响分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2022，41(7)：1 476–1 487.(RUI Rui，HE Shikai，LIU Hao，et al. Parametric analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments using hybrid tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2022，41(7)：1 476–1 487.(in Chinese))
[6] 陈仁朋，刘骐炜，姜正晖. 桩承式路堤中的静动力土拱效应[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报，2017，34(5)：31–40.(CHEN Renpeng，LIU Qiwei，JIANG Zhenghui. Static and dynamic soil arching effect of pile-supported embankments[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering，2017，34(5)：31–40.(in Chinese))
[7] CHEN R P，CHEN Y M，HAN J，et al. A theoretical solution for pile-supported embankments on soft soils under one-dimensional compression[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2008，45(5)：611–623.
[8] 孙潇昊，缪林昌，林海山. 不同埋深砂土盾构隧道掘进开挖面前方土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学，2017，38(10)：2 980–2 988.(SUN Xiaohao，MIAO Lingchang，LIN Haishan. Arching effect of soil ahead of working face in shield tunnel in sand with various depths[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2017，38(10)：2 980–2 988. (in Chinese))
[9] CHEN R P，TANG L J，YIN X S，et al. An improved 3D wedge- prism model for the face stability analysis of the shield tunnel in cohesionless soils[J]. Acta Geotechnica，2015，10：683–692.
[10] 吴 楷，陈仁朋，孟凡衍，等. 基坑开挖坑底土拱效应离心模型试验及数值分析[J]. 岩土工程学报，2024，46(9)：1 936–1 944. (WU Kai，CHEN Renpeng，MENG Fanyan，et al. Centrifuge modeling of excavation and numerical analyses of soil arching below excavation base[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2024，46(9)：1 936–1 944.(in Chinese))
[11] IGLESIA G R，EINSTEIN HERBERT H，WHITMAN ROBERT V. Determination of vertical loading on underground structures based on an arching evolution concept[C]// Proceedings of the Geo-Engineering for Underground Facilities. San Diego：American Society of Civil Engineers，2013：1 448–1 457.
[12] IGLESIA G R，EINSTEIN HERBERT H，WHITMAN ROBERT V. Validation of centrifuge model scaling for soil systems via trapdoor tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2011，137(11)：1 075–1 089.
[13] IGLESIA G R，EINSTEIN H H，WHITMAN R V. Investigation of soil arching with centrifuge tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2014，140(2)：04013005.
[14] COSTA Y D，ZORNBERG J G，BUENO B S，et al. Failure mechanisms in sand over a deep active trapdoor[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2009，135(11)：1 741–1 753.
[15] BURKE S D S T，ELSHAFIE M Z E B. Arching in granular soils：Experimental observations of deformation mechanisms[J]. Géotechnique，2021，71(10)：866–878
[16] LIU X Y，FRANZA A，JIMENEZ R. Effects of relative density and dilatancy on stress and deformation arching of sand over an active trapdoor[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2024，173：106485.
[17] 芮 瑞，LIN H A，杨俊超，等. 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学，2025，46(6)：1 741–1 750.(RUI Rui，LIN H A，YANG Junchao，et al. Research on the evolution of soil arching in passive trapdoor tests[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2025，46(6)：1 741–1 750.(in Chinese))
[18] RUI R，VAN TOL F，XIA X L，et al. Evolution of soil arching; 2D DEM simulations[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2016，73：199–209.
[19] 徐长节，梁禄钜，陈其志，等. 考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学，2018，39(6)：1 927–1 934.(XU Changjie，LIANG Luju，CHEN Qizhi，et al. Research on loosening earth pressure considering the patterns of stress distribution in loosening zone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2018，39(6)：1 927– 1 934.(in Chinese))
[20] STONE KO JL，WOOD D MUIR. Effects of dilatancy and particle size observed in model tests on sand[J]. Soils and Foundations，1992，32(4)：43–57.
[21] EVANS C H. An examination of arching in granular soils[M. S. Thesis][D]. Cambridge： Massachusetts Institute of Technology，1983.
[22] BURKE S D S T，ELSHAFIE M Z E B. Arching in granular soils：Limit state equilibrium[J]. Géotechnique，2021，71(10)：700–713.
[23] ZHAO Y，GONG Q M，WU Y J，et al. Evolution of active arching in granular materials：Insights from load，displacement，strain，and particle flow[J]. Powder Technology，2021，384：160–175.
[24] BOLTON M D，LAU C K. Scale effects in the bearing capacity of granular soils[C]// 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Rio de Janeiro：[s. n.]，1989，307–312.
[25] SITHARAM T G，NIMBKAR M S. Micromechanical modelling of granular materials：effect of particle size and gradation[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering，2000，18：91–117.
[26] 戴北冰，杨 峻，周翠英. 颗粒大小对颗粒材料力学行为影响初探[J]. 岩土力学，2014，35(7)：1 878–1 884.(DAI Beibing，YANG Jun，ZHOU Cuiying. A preliminary investigation on effect of particle size on mechanical behavior of granular materials[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2014，35(7)：1 878–1 884.(in Chinese))
[27] GUO P J，ZHOU S H. Arch in granular materials as a free surface problem[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics，2013，37(9)：1 048–1 065.
[28] AHMADI A，HOSSEININIA S E. An experimental investigation on stable arch formation in cohesionless granular materials using developed trapdoor test[J]. Powder Technology，2018，330：137–146.
[29] TANAKA TADATSUGU，SAKAI TOSHINORI. Progressive failure and scale effect of trap-door problems with granular materials[J]. Soils and Foundations，1993，33(1)：11–22
[30] XIE Y P，YANG J S，ZHENG X C，et al. Effect of particle size distributions (PSDs) on ground responses induced by tunnelling in dense coarse-grained soils：A DEM investigation[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2023，163：105763.
[31] KING L，BOUAZZA A，DUBSKY S，et al. Kinematics of soil arching in piled embankments[J]. Géotechnique，2019，69(11)：941–958.
[32] 刘骐炜. 砂土土拱效应演化规律及理论模型[博士学位论文][D]. 长沙：湖南大学，2022.(LIU Qiwei. Evolution law and theoretical model of soil arching in sand[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Changsha：Hunan University，2022.(in Chinese))
[33] XIE Y P，YANG J S，ZHENG C F，JIN Y. Effect of particle size distributions(PSDs) on ground responses induced by tunnelling in dense coarse-grained soils：A DEM investigation[J]. Computers and geotechnics，2023，163(Nov.)：1.1–1.19.
[34] BATHURST RICHARD J，ROTHENBURG L. Observations on stress-force-fabric relationships in idealized granular materials[J]. Mechanics of materials，1990，9(1)：65–80.
[35] CHEN R P，LIU Q W，WU H N，et al. Effect of particle shape on the development of 2D soil arching[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2020，125：103662.
[36] WEN R J，TAN C，WU Y，et al. Grain size effect on the mechanical behavior of cohesionless coarse-grained soils with the discrete element method[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering，2018，2018(1)：4608930.
2026, Vol. 45 
