基于岩溶突涌水风险评价的隧道施工许可机制及其应用研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (424 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要突水涌泥是岩溶隧道施工中的主要地质灾害之一，建立基于勘察、设计和施工3个阶段突水风险评价的隧道施工许可机制是减少损失和控制风险的有效途径。通过对我国近50 a岩溶隧道(洞)突涌水工程实例资料的系统收集与归类整理，分析隧道突涌水的孕险环境和致险因子，遴选出突涌水的典型影响因素作为模糊层次评估方法的影响因子，统计分析出各影响因素与突涌水发生概率和发生次数之间的隶属函数或表征关系，采用综合赋权法确定评价指标的权重，建立岩溶隧道突涌水风险模糊层次评价模型，进行隧道施工前勘察和设计2个阶段的突涌水风险预评价和施工中的动态评价。首先，据勘察资料对隧道突涌水的孕险环境进行初步评价，以确定隧道不同区段降低致险因子影响度的施工对策；然后，为检验其有效性，在设计阶段综合考虑孕险环境和致险因子进行突涌水风险的预评价；最后，在施工过程中，基于突涌水风险预评价结果的区段特征，全程动态追踪隧道揭露围岩的水文地质、力场和地球物理场等反馈信息，辨识隧道即将揭露区段突涌水风险的孕险环境和致险因子，进行突涌水风险等级的动态修正，并通过对不同风险等级区段的风险接受准则和风险控制对策的界定，实现隧道施工期突涌水风险的实时、准确和有效的风险管理，从而建立完善的基于隧道施工许可机制的施工安全风险控制体系。经三峡翻坝高速公路3条高风险岩溶隧道试运行证明，基于突涌水风险评价的施工许可机制在岩溶隧道突水预测与灾害控制方面具有明显作用，其分析结果相对准确可靠，具有广泛的应用前景。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：隧道工程, 突涌水, 风险评价, 模糊层次分析, 施工许可机制

Abstract：Water inrush and mud gushing are the typical common geologic hazards for the karst tunnel construction. Based on risk evaluation model of water inrush，management system of construction permission mechanism can be established to reduce the economic loss and water inrush risk. The major factors are summed up and selected as the impact factor of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP) by collecting and collating information of water inrush examples of karst tunnels in recent 50 years，the membership function is proposed between the factors and the probability of occurrence of water inrush and its volume，and a FAHP model of risk evaluation for water inrush is established by a comprehensive assigning method which is adopted to determine the weight of evaluation indices；and water inrush risk can be evaluated for the three different stages of tunnel construction. Firstly，based on the preliminary evaluation for environment of dangerous source at the prospecting stage，the risk factors effect and construction of risk reduction can be determinated. Secondly，pre-evaluation of water inrush for environment of dangerous and risk factors can be done in order to prove the effectiveness of construction organization at the design stage. At last，based on distribution of the pre-evaluation results，risk grade can be modified by tracing the hydrogeology，mechanical and geophysical information of exposed rock during the excavation process；and risk control criterion and countermeasures for different excavated sections can be determined by identifying the environment of dangerous source and risk factors for next excavated section；and management system of construction risk can be established in order to get the accurate，effective and real-time risk control of water inrush. The risk management system of water inrush has been proved that the evaluation result is accurate and reliable by its application to three typical karst tunnel of Sanxia highway，which can be further used for other underground projects.

Key words： tunnelling engineering water inrush risk evaluation fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP) construction license mechanism

收稿日期: 2011-01-30

引用本文:

李利平1，李术才1，陈军2，李景龙1，许振浩1，石少帅1. 基于岩溶突涌水风险评价的隧道施工许可机制及其应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(7): 1345-1355.
LI Liping1，LI Shucai1，CHEN Jun2，LI Jinglong1，XU Zhenhao1，SHI Shaoshuai1. CONSTRUCTION LICENSE MECHANISM AND ITS APPLICATION BASED ON KARST WATER INRUSH RISK EVALUATION. , 2011, 30(7): 1345-1355.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2011/V30/I7/1345

[1]	李术才，薛翊国，张庆松，等. 高风险岩溶地区隧道施工地质灾害综合预报预警关键技术研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，28(7)：1 297-1 307.(LI Shucai，XUE Yiguo，ZHANG Qingsong，et al. Key technology study on comprehensive prediction and early-warning of geological hazards during tunnel construction in high-risk karst areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，28(7)：1 297-1 307.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[2]	杨天鸿，唐春安，谭志宏，等. 岩体破坏突水模型研究现状及突水预测预报研究发展趋势[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(2)：268-277.(YANG Tianhong，TANG Chun?an，TAN Zhihong，et al. State of the art of inrush models in rock mass failure and development trend for prediction and forecast of groundwater inrush[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(2)：268-277.(in Chinese))
[3]	李利平. 高风险岩溶隧道突水灾变演化机制及其应用研究[博士学位论文][D]. 济南：山东大学，2009.(LI Liping. Study on catastrophe evolution mechansim of karst water inrush and its engineering application of high risk karst tunnel[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Jinan：Shandong University，2009.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[4]	蒋建平，高广运，李晓昭，等. 隧道工程突水机制及对策[J]. 中国铁道科学，2006，27(5)：76-82.(JIANG Jianping，GAO Guangyun，LI Xiaozhao，et al. Mechanism and countermeasures of water- bursting in railroad tunnel engineering[J]. China Railway Science，2006，27(5)：76-82.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[5]	林传年，李利平，韩行瑞. 复杂岩溶地区隧道涌水预测方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，27(7)：1 469-1 476.(LIN Chuannian，LI Liping，HAN Xingrui. Research on forecast method of tunnel water inrush in complex karst areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，27(7)：1 469-1 476.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[6]	王纯祥，蒋宇静，江崎哲郎，等. 复杂条件下长大隧道预测及其对环境影响评价[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2008，26(2)：268-277.(WANG Chunxiang，JIANG Yujing，ESAKI T，et al. Prediction of groundwater inflow in long tunnel and its influence on environment under complex conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2008，26(2)：268-277.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[7]	李利平，李术才，张庆松. 岩溶地区隧道裂隙水突出力学机制研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(2)：523-528.(LI Liping，LI Shucai，ZHANG Qingsong. Study of mechanism of water inrush induced by hydraulic fracturing in kast tunnels[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(2)：523-528.(in Chinese))
[8]	王媛，王飞，倪小东. 基于非稳定渗流随机有限元的隧洞涌水量预测[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(10)：1 986-1 994. (WANG Yuan，WANG Fei，NI Xiaodong. Prediction of water inflow in tunnel based on stochastic finite element of unsteady seepage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(10)：1 986-1 994.(in Chinese))
[9]	黄宏伟. 隧道及地下工程建设中的风险管理研究进展[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2006，2(1)：13-20.(HUANG Hongwei. State of the art of the research on risk management in construction of tunnel and underground works[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2006，2(1)：13-20.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[10]	陈龙，黄宏伟. 岩石隧道工程风险浅析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(1)：100-115.(CHEN Long，HUANG Hongwei. Risk analysis of rock tunnel engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(1)：100-115.(in Chinese))
[11]	王燕，黄宏伟，薛亚东. 钻爆法施工隧道塌方风险分析[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报：自然科学版，2009，25(1)：23-27.(WANG Yan，HUANG Hongwei，XUE Yadong. Risk analysis of collapse for tunnels constructed by drill and blast method[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University：Natural Science，2009，25(1)：23-27.(in Chinese))
[12]	张庆松，李术才，韩宏伟，等. 岩溶隧道施工风险评价与灾害防治技术研究[J]. 山东大学学报：工学版，2009，39(3)：106-110.(ZHANG Qingsong，LI Shucai，HAN Hongwei，et al. Study on risk evaluation and water inrush disaster preventing technology during construction of karst tunnels[J]. Journal of Shandong University：Engineering Science，2009，39(3)：106-110.(in Chinese))
[13]	李昌有，傅鹤林，李亮. 某水下隧道施工突涌水与塌方的风险评价[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报，2009，6(6)：22-26.(LI Changyou，FU Helin，LI Liang. Assessment of collapse disaster during tunnel construction in an underwater tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering，2009，6(6)：22-26.(in Chinese))
[14]	王进志. 雪峰山特长铁路隧道不良地质风险再评估与风险动态管理[J]. 隧道建设，2009，29(5)：552-557.(WANG Jinzhi. Re- assessment and dynamic control of adverse geological risks in extra-long Xuefengshan railway tunnel[J]. Tunnel Construction，2009，29(5)：552-557.(in Chinese))
[15]	许建聪，王余富. 水下隧道裂隙围岩渗流控制因素敏感性层次分析[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(6)：1 719-1 725.(XU Jiancong，WANG Yufu. Analytic hierarchy process of factor sensitivity on seepage control of underwater tunnel fissured surrounding rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(6)：1 719-1 725.(in Chinese))
[16]	闫玉茹，黄宏伟，胡群芳，等. 大连湾海底隧道钻爆法施工风险评估研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2007，26(增2)：3 616-3 624. (YAN Yuru，HUANG Hongwei，HU Qunfang，et al. Risk assessment on drill and blasting method of Dalian bay subsea tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2007，26(Supp.2)： 3 616-3 624.(in Chinese))
[17]	沈荣喜，吴秀仪，刘长武，等. 海底隧道施工过程中突水风险研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报：交通科学与工程版，2008，32(3)：385-388.(SHEN Rongxi，WU Xiuyi，LIU Changwu，et al. Research of water inrush on subsea tunnel construction[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology：Transportation Science and Engineering，2008，32(3)：385-388.(in Chinese))
[18]	张顶立，李乒，房倩，等. 基于风险系数的海底隧道纵断面确定方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(1)：9-19.(ZHANG Dingli，LI Ping，FANG Qian，et al. Method for determining longitudinal section of subsea tunnel based on risk coefficient[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(1)：9-19.(in Chinese))
[19]	周红波，何锡兴，蒋建军，等. 地铁盾构法隧道工程建设风险识别与应对[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2006，2(3)：475-479.(ZHOU Hongbo，HE Xixing，JIANG Jianjun，et al. Risk identification and handling in construction of metro shield tunnel project[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2006，2(3)：475-479.(in Chinese))
[20]	彭铭，黄宏伟，胡群芳，等. 基于盾构隧道施工监测的动态风险数据库开发[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2007，3(增1)：1 255- 1 260.(PENG Ming，HUANG Hongwei，HU Qunfang，et al. A risk database designed for dynamic risk management in shield tunneling from site monitoring data[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2007，3(Supp.1)：1 255-1 260.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[21]	王晶，王鹏飞，谭跃虎. 地铁隧道工程施工过程中风险管理研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报，2009，5(2)：385-389.(WANG Jing，WANG Pengfei，TAN Yuehu. Study on risk management of subway tunnel engineering during construction process[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering，2009，5(2)：385-389.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[22]	同济大学. 地铁及地下工程建设风险管理指南[R]. 上海：同济大学，2007.(Tongji University. Guidelines of risk management for metro tunnelling and underground engineering work[R]. Shanghai：Tongji University，2007.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[23]	谢季坚. 模糊数学方法及其应用[M]. 武汉：华中科技大学出版社，2006：37-46.(XIE Jijian. Fuzzy mathematical methods and its application[M]. Wuhan：Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press，2006：37-46.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[24]	ESKESEN S D，TENGBORG P，KAMPMANN J，et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management：International Tunnelling Association，Working Group No.2[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2004，19(3)：217-237