隧道穿过土层分界面振动台模型试验研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1264 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了研究穿过不同土层的隧道在地震作用下的反应，进行隧道穿过土层分界面的振动台模型试验。采用自主研制的层叠剪切箱减小边界效应，装填黏土和砂土构成横向非均匀场地，模型隧道的轴线垂直穿过2种土的竖直分界面。通过输入不同幅值的El-Centro波，采集土层和隧道不同观测点处的加速度和应变等数据并进行分析，研究了在不同性质土层中地震波传播的规律以及隧道地震响应的特点，分析土层分界面对于隧道地震响应的影响。试验结果表明，地下结构的变形主要由周围土体的相对位移控制；砂土和黏土动力特性以及对隧道约束作用的差异会导致分界面两侧的隧道地震响应不同，产生相对位移，令隧道产生转动、弯曲和扭剪。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：隧道工程, 振动台模型试验, 地震响应, 土体性质, El-Centro波

Abstract：In order to study the seismic responses of tunnel through different soil layers in the earthquake，the shaking table model test was carried out. Shear box developed independently was used to reduce the boundary effect；lateral non-uniform site was made up by clay and sand；the axis of tunnel was vertically through the interface. After El-Centro seismic waves of different amplitudes were input from the base，acceleration and strain data were collected and analyzed. The features of seismic wave propagation in different soil layers were studied and the influences of soil interface on seismic responses of tunnel were analyzed. Results demonstrate that the deformation of tunnel is mainly controlled by relative displacement of the soil around it. Moreover，the differences between clay and sand in dynamic characteristics and restraints to tunnel will cause different responses of tunnel on both sides of the interface，and then the relative displacement will lead to spin，bend and twist-shear of tunnel.

Key words： tunneling engineering shaking table model test seismic response soil property El-Centro wave

收稿日期: 2012-11-16

引用本文:

邹炎，景立平，李永强. 隧道穿过土层分界面振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(sl): 3340-3348.
ZOU Yan，JING Liping，LI Yongqiang. STUDY OF SHAKING TABLE MODEL TEST OF TUNNEL THROUGH SOIL INTERFACE. , 2014, 33(sl): 3340-3348.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2014/V33/Isl/3340

[1]	林皋. 地下结构抗震分析综述(上)[J]. 世界地震工程，1990，2(2)：1-10.(LIN Gao. Summary of underground structure seismic analysis (Part I)[J]. World Earthquake Engineering，1990，2(2)：1-10.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[2]	黑田晃. 阪神?淡路大震災被害調査報告書[M]. 东京：建設コンサルタンツ協会，1996：75-80.(KURODA A. Report on seismic damages in Hanshin-Awaji earthquake[M]. Tokyo：Japan Society of Civil Engineering，1996：75-80.(in Japanese)) " target="_blank">
[3]	IIDA H，HIROTO T，YOSHIDA N，et al. Damage to Daikai subway station[J]. Soils and Foundations，1996：283-300. " target="_blank">
[4]	郑永来，杨林德. 地下结构震害与抗震对策[J]. 工程抗震，1999，(4)：23-28.(ZHENG Yonglai，YANG Linde. Seismic damages and countermeasures of underground structures[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering，1999，(4)：23-28.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[5]	IWATATE T，KOBAYASHI Y，KUSU H，et al. Investigation and shaking table tests of subway structures of the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake[C]// Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. New Zealand：New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering，2000：1 129-1 135. " target="_blank">
[6]	陶连金，王沛霖，边金. 典型地铁车站结构振动台模型试验[J]. 北京工业大学学报，2006，32(9)：798-801.(TAO Lianjin，WANG Peilin，BIAN Jin. A shaking table test method on the representative subway station structure[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology，2006，32(9)：798-801.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[7]	陈国兴，庄海洋，程绍革，等. 土-地铁隧道动力相互作用的大型振动台试验：试验方案设计[J]. 地震工程与工程振动，2006，26(6)：178-183.(CHEN Guoxing，ZHUANG Haiyang，CHENG Shaoge，et al. A large-scale shaking table test for dynamic soil-metro tunnel interaction: test scheme[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration，2006，26(6)：178-183.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[8]	陈国兴，庄海洋，杜修力，等. 土-地铁车站结构动力相互作用大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动，2007，27(2)：171-176.(CHENG Guoxing，ZHUANG Haiyang，DU Xiuli，et al. Analysis of large-scale shaking table test of dynamic soil-subway station interaction[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration，2007，27(2)：171-176.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[9]	方林，蒋树屏，林志，等. 穿越断层隧道振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2011，32(9)：2 709-2 713.(FANG Lin，JIANG Shuping，LIN Zhi，et al. Shaking table model test study of tunnel through fault[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(9)：2 709-2 713.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[10]	耿萍，吴川，唐金良，等. 穿越断层破碎带隧道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(7)：1 406-1 413.(GENG Ping，WU Chuan，TANG Jinliang，et al. Analysis of dynamic response properties for tunnel through fault fracture zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(7)：1 406-1 413.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[11]	林皋，朱彤，林蓓. 结构动力模型试验的相似技巧[J]. 大连理工大学学报，2000，40(1)：1-8.(LIN Gao，ZHU Tong，LIN Bei. Similarity technique for dynamic structural model[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology，2000，40(1)：1-8.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[12]	孙海峰，景立平，王宁伟，等. 振动台多功能叠层剪切箱研制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(12)：2 498-2 506.(SUN Haifeng，JING Liping，WANG Ningwei，et al. Development of multifunctional laminar shear container for shaking table test[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(12)：2 498-2 506.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[13]	孙海峰，景立平，孟宪春，等. 振动台试验三维叠层剪切箱研制[J]. 振动与冲击，2012，31(17)：26-32.(SUN Haifeng，JING Liping，MENG Xianchun，et al. A three-dimensional laminar shear soil container for shaking table test[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock，2012，31(17)：26-32.(in Chinese))
[14]	张克绪，谢君斐. 土动力学[M]. 北京：地震出版社，1989：4-5. (ZHANG Kexu，XIE Junfei. Soil dynamics[M]. Beijing：Seismological Press，1989：4-5.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[15]	大崎顺彦. 地震动的谱分析入门[M]. 2版. 田琪译. 北京：地震出版社，2008：171-175.(OSAKI Yorihiko. SHIN Introduction to the spectral analysis of earthquake ground motion[M]. 2nd ed. Translated by TIAN Qi. Beijing：Seismological Press，2008：171-175.(in Japanese)) " target="_blank">
[16]	陈国兴. 岩土地震工程学[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2007：244-251. (CHEN Guoxing. Geotechnical earthquake engineering[M]. Beijing：Science Press，2007：244-251.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[17]	陈正勋，王泰典，黄灿辉. 山岭隧道受震损害类型与原因之案例研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(1)：45-57.(CHEN Zhengxun，WANG Taidian，HUANG Canhui. Case study of earthquake- induced damage patterns of rock tunnel and associated reason[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(1)：45-57.(in Chinese))
[18]	WANG J N. Seismic design of tunnels：a state-of-the-art approach[M]. New York：Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas Inc.，1993：53-82. " target="_blank">