考虑填料–土工格室相互作用的加筋路堤力学响应研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.03.020

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1025 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要针对有砟轨道加筋路堤计算分析中难以考虑土工格室对碎石填料嵌锁及摩擦作用的现状，在大比尺直剪试验基础上建立考虑填料–格室相互作用的三维计算模型。通过室内模型试验验证该计算的可靠度和优越性，进而系统地分析有/无加筋情况下，填料强度、土工格室刚度及地基压缩性等参数对路堤力学响应的影响。结果表明：土工格室的嵌锁作用使得加筋对路堤响应的影响在其布设层发挥程度更大，该影响通过填料与格室及填料内的摩擦作用向周围传递且不断衰减；填料强度较低或地基较软时能加强土工格室对路堤响应的影响，对于填料内摩擦角为20°和地基变形模量为5 MPa的工况而言，加筋后基床侧向位移峰值分别降低60%和72%，应力峰值亦显著降低且分布区域明显扩大；土工格室弹性模量为0.2～2.5 GPa时，路堤力学响应受其影响较大。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：土力学, 有砟轨道, 加筋, 土工格室, 相互作用, 力学响应

Abstract： Abstract：The current analysis on reinforced railway embankment does not take the confinement and friction effects provided by geocell into consideration. To deal with this issue，a new model considering the interaction between the ballast and the geocell was proposed on the base of large-scale direct shear tests. The typical results of embankment behavior from the numerical computation agreed well with those from the laboratory model tests，which confirmed the reliability of the analysis model established. Further systematical analysis on the influence of the ballast strength，geocell stiffness and foundation compressibility on the mechanical response of embankment were carried out. The results showed that the reinforcement made significant influence on the embankment behavior especially near the reinforced layer due to the confinement from geocell. And the effect was spread to the surroundings through the friction provided by geocell and gravel itself and was dissipated gradually. The weaker ballast and softer foundation soil were found to enhance the reinforcement effect on embankment behavior in a greater degree. In the case when the internal friction angle of ballast was 20°and the deformation modulus of foundation soil 5 MPa，the peak lateral displacement was reduced 60% and 72% respectively. The peak stress decreased as well and the distribution range increased markedly due to the reinforcement. The mechanical response of embankment was found to be sensitive to the elastic modulus of geocell in the ranges of 0.2 GPa to 2.5 GPa.

Key words： soil mechanics ballast railway reinforcement geocell interaction mechanism mechanical behavior

收稿日期: 2014-02-28

引用本文:

邓鹏1，郭林2，蔡袁强1，2，王军2. 考虑填料–土工格室相互作用的加筋路堤力学响应研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(03): 621-630.
DENG Peng1，GUO Lin2，CAI Yuanqiang1，2，WANG Jun2. MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCED EMBANKMENT CONSIDERING INTERACTION BETWEEN GRAVEL AND GEOCELL. , 2015, 34(03): 621-630.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.03.020 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2015/V34/I03/621

[12]	赵明华，张玲，曹文贵，等. 基于弹性地基梁理论的土工格室加筋体变形分析[J]. 岩土力学，2009，30(12)：3 695-3 699.(ZHAO Minghua，ZHANG Ling，CAO Wengui，et al. Deformation analysis of geocell reinforcement based on theory for beam on elastic foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2009，30(12)：3 695-3 699. (in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[15]	何艳平，张思峰，王冠英，等. 土工格室加固铁路软弱基床的有限元分析[J]. 山东建筑大学学报，2008，23(5)：431-434.(HE Yanping，ZHANG Sifeng，WANG Guanying，et al. FEM analysis of geocell reinforing soft subgrade of railway[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University，2008，23(5)：431-434.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[16]	刘文白，邓益兵. 土工格室加固路堤的数值模拟与现场试验[J]. 湖南大学学报：自然科学版，2008，35(11)：249-254.(LIU Wenbai，DENG Yibing. Numerical simulation and field test on embankment reinforced with geocell[J]. Journal of Hunan University：Naturnal Science，2008，35(11)：249-254.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[13]	边学成，宋广，陈云敏. Pasternak地基中土工格室加筋体的受力变形分析[J]. 工程力学，2012，29(5)：147-155.(BIAN Xuecheng，SONG Guang，CHEN Yunmin. Deformation behaviors of geocell reinforcement in Pasternak ground[J]. Engneering Mechanics，2012，29(5)：147-155.(in Chinese))
[17]	王家全，周健，丛林，等. 高填方加筋新旧路堤现场试验与数值模拟分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(1)：2 943-2 950. (WANG Jiaquan，ZHOU Jian，CONG Lin，et al. Analysis between numerical and field tests of high fill reinforced widening embankment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(1)：2 943-2 950.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[20]	SELIG E T，WATERS J M. Track geotechnology and substructure management[M]. London，England：[s. n.]，1994：11-13. " target="_blank">
[1]	LACKENBY J，INDRARATNA B，MCDOWELL G，et al. Effect of confining pressure on ballast degradation and deformation under cyclic triaxial loading[J]. Geotechnique，2007，57(6)：527-536. " target="_blank">
[2]	廖劲，曾维德. 土工格室在既有线路基基床加固工程中的运用[J]. 铁道工程学报，2003，(2)：48-51.(LIAO Jin，ZENG Weide. Application of geogrid in consolidating subgrade bed of existing railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engeering Society，2003，(2)：48-51.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[3]	ZHOU H，WEN X. Model studies on geogrid-or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2008，26(3)：231-238.
[4]	LESHCHINSKY B，LING H I. Numerical modeling of behavior of railway ballasted structure with geocell confinement[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2013，36(2)：33-43. " target="_blank">
[6]	LESHCHINSKY B，LING H. Effects of geocell confinement on strength and deformation behavior of gravel[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2012，139(2)：340-352. " target="_blank">
[8]	吴晓莉，黄立恒. 土工格室加筋路堤试验研究[J]. 西部探矿工程， 2009，21(6)：164-166.(WU Xiaoli，HUANG Liheng. Studies on embanlment of the reinforced by geogrid with model tests[J]. West- China Exploration Engineering，2009，21(6)：164-166.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[10]	罗强，周华，王之犍. 土工格室加固既有线铁路基床试验研究[J]. 铁道学报，2004，26(3)：98-102.(LUO Qiang，ZHOU Hua，WANG Zhijian. Test study on geocell-stabilized railway subgrades[J]. Journal of China Railway Society，2004，26(3)：98-102.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[11]	ALVES C，CALCADA R，SILVA CARDOSO A. Ballast mats for the reduction of railway traffic vibrations：numerical study[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2012，42(11)：137-150. " target="_blank">
[5]	DASH S K，SHIVADAS A S. Performance improvement of railway ballast using geocells[J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal，2012，42(3)：186-193. " target="_blank">
[9]	王炳龙，周顺华，宫全美，等. 不同高度土工格室整治基床下沉病害的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报，2003，25(2)：163-166.(WANG Binglong，ZHOU Shunhua，GONG Quanmei，et al. Experimental study on treatment of subgrade subsidence by geocell of different heights[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2003，25(2)： 163-166.(in Chinese))
[7]	曹新文，蔡英. 客运专线土工格室复合基床的试验研究[J]. 铁道工程学报，2006，(1)：22-26.(CAO Xinwen，CAI Ying. Experimental research on the geocell of compound subgrade-bed for passenger dedicated railway line[J]. Journal of Railway Engeering Society，2006 (1)：22-26.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[14]	杨晓华，戴铁丁，许新桩. 土工格室在铁路软弱基床加固中的应用[J]. 交通运输工程学报，2005，5(2)：42-46.(YANG Xiaohua，DAI Tieding，XU Xinzhuang. Geocell application in reinforcing soft subgrade of railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering，2005，5(2)：42-46.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[18]	YANG X. Numerical analyses of geocell-reinforced granular soils under static and repeated loads[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Kansas：University of Kansas，2010. " target="_blank">
[19]	INDRARATNA B，NIMBALKAR S，CHRISTIE D，et al. Field assessment of the performance of a ballasted rail track with and without geosynthetics[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2010，136(7)：907-917. " target="_blank">
[21]	LING H I，LESHCHINSKY D，WANG J P，et al. Seismic response of geocell retaining walls：experimental studies[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2009，135(4)：515-524. " target="_blank">