深长隧道充填型岩溶管道渗透失稳突水机制三维流–固耦合模型试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.1393

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (811 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为研究岩溶地区隧道开挖过程中充填型岩溶管道受施工扰动和地下水渗流作用发生失稳突水的机制，以湖北省保康至宜昌高速公路尚家湾隧道突涌水段为工程背景，通过大型三维可视化固液耦合试验平台、水压加载控制系统以及水压环境下有较好相似度的流-固耦合岩石和充填物相似材料的研制，开展深长隧道充填型岩溶管道渗透失稳突水的大比尺三维流-固耦合模型试验，真实再现隧道开挖和水压加载过程中，岩溶管道充填物中裂隙形成–扩展–导水通道贯通–突水的全过程，通过位移、应力和渗压变化规律的分析，揭示了充填物渗透失稳突水过程的灾变演化机制。试验结果表明：(1) 施工过程中充填型岩溶管道突水是开挖扰动和高地下水位高渗透力作用诱发充填物渗透失稳的结果；(2) 充填物受开挖扰动影响比围岩更明显，变形量比围岩大20%～25%，应力释放率比围岩高30%；水压加载阶段，水头高度升高到6.0 m时，充填物位移突增50%，渗压下降速率达0.6 kPa/min，达到失稳临界状态；(3) 岩溶管道突水受其发育形态影响比较明显，其弯曲角度较大的部位是阻碍上部水和充填物突出的主要屏障；(4) 充填型岩溶管道渗透失稳突水的灾变演化过程经历四个阶段：形成离散的微小裂隙、裂隙连通形成导水通道、在渗流作用下导水通道扩展延伸、导水通道贯通形成突水路径，其中前两个阶段主要受开挖扰动影响，后两个阶段与高水位高水压的渗流作用密切相关。试验成果对突涌水机制的研究和工程中突涌水灾害的防治具有一定的指导意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：深长隧道, 充填型岩溶管道, 渗透失稳, 灾变演化机制, 流&ndash, 固耦合模型试验

Abstract：In order to explore the water-inrush mechanism of filled-type karst conduit under the influence of construction disturbance and groundwater seepage，the 3D large-scale fluid-solid coupling model text is carried out based on the water-inrush section of Shangjiawan tunnel in Baokang-Yichang expressway. The 3D visual fluid-solid coupling test platform，the water-loading control system，and the similar materials of high similarity simulating rocks and fillings in water environment are developed. The process of cracks formation-extension- connection-water inrush is truly reproduced during excavation and water loading. The catastrophe evolution mechanism of fillings seepage failure and water inrush under the permeation effects is revealed by analyzing the variation characteristics of displacement，stress and seepage pressure. The research results are as follows. (1) The water inrush of filled-type karst conduit is the result of fillings seepage failure caused by construction disturbance，high groundwater level and high seepage pressure. (2) The influence is more obvious on fillings than surrounding rock. The displacement of fillings is 20%-20% larger than that of surrounding rock，and the stress release rate is 30% higher. In water-loading stage，as the water head height rises to 6.0m，the displacement of fillings rises 50% and the seepage pressure falling rate is 0.6 kPa/min. The fillings develops into a critical state. (3) The water inrush is significantly influenced by the development morphology of karst conduit. The large-angle bend position is the barrier to prevent the inrush of water and fillings. (4) The catastrophe evolution process can be divided into four stages： Discrete tiny cracks are formed. Water channel is formed by cracks connection. Water channel is extended under the function of seepage. Water inrush pathway is formed by water channel transfixion. The first two stages are mainly influenced by excavation disturbance，while the latter two stages are closely related to the seepage effect caused by high water level and high water pressure. The results will make certain guiding significance to research on mechanism of water inrush and control of the disaster.

Key words： deep large tunnel filled-type karst conduit seepage failure catastrophe evolution mechanism fluid-solid coupling model test

引用本文:

周毅，李术才，李利平，石少帅，张乾青，陈迪杨，宋曙光. 深长隧道充填型岩溶管道渗透失稳突水机制三维流–固耦合模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(09): 22-22.
ZHOU Yi，LI Shucai，LI Liping，SHI Shaoshuai，ZHANG Qianqing，CHEN Diyang，SONG Shuguang. 3D FLUID-SOLID COUPLING MODEL TEST ON SEEPAGE FAILURE WATER-INRUSH MECHANISM OF FILLED-TYPE KARST CONDUIT IN DEEP LARGE TUNNEL. , 2015, 34(09): 22-22.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.1393 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2015/V34/I09/22

[1]	李利平，李术才，陈军，等. 基于岩溶突涌水风险评价的隧道施工许可机制及其应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(7)：1 345-1 354.(LI Liping，LI Shucai，CHEN Jun，et al. Construction license mechanism and its application based on karst water inrush risk evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(7)：1 345-1 354.(in Chinese))
[2]	李利平. 高风险岩溶隧道突水灾变演化机制及其应用研究[博士学位论文][D]. 济南：山东大学，2009.(LI Liping. Study on catastrophe evolution mechansim of karst water inrush and its engineering application of high risk karst tunnel[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Jinan：Shandong University，2009.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[7]	钱鸣高，缪协兴，许家林. 岩层控制中的关键层理论研究[J]. 煤炭学报，1996，21(3)：226-230.(QIAN Minggao，MIU Xiexing，XU Jialin. Theoretical study of key stratum in ground control[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，1996，21(3)：226-230.(in Chinese))
[16]	赵延林，张盛国，万文，等. 基于流态转换理论巷道前伏溶洞突水的流固耦合-强度折减法分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(9)：1 852-1 862.(ZHAO Yanlin，ZHANG Shengguo，WAN Wen，et al. Solid-fluid coupling strength reduction method for larst cave water inrush before roadway based on flow state conversion theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(9)：1 852-1 862.(in Chinese))
[19]	李术才，李利平，李树忱，等. 地下工程突涌水物理模拟试验系统的研制及应用[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报，2010，27(3)：299-304.(LI Shucai，LI Liping，LI Shuchen，et al. Development and application of similar physical model test system for water inrush of underground engineering[J]. Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering，2010，27(3)：299-304.(in Chinese))
[5]	王作宇，刘鸿泉，王培彝，等. 承压水上采煤学科理论与实践[J]. 煤炭学报，1994，19(1)：42-48.(WANG Zuoyu，LIU Hongquan，WANG Peiyi，et al. Theory and practice of coal mining discipline on confined water[J]. Journal of China coal society，1994，19(1)：42-48.(in Chinese))
[10]	李术才，周宗青，李利平，等. 岩溶隧道突水风险评价理论与方法及工程应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(9)：1 858-1 867.(LI Shucai，ZHOU Zongqing，LI Liping，et al. Risk evaluation theory and method of water inrush in karst tunnels and its applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(9)：1 858-1 867. (in Chinese))
[11]	许振浩，李术才，李利平，等. 基于风险动态评估与控制的岩溶隧道施工许可机制[J]. 岩土工程学报，2011，33(11)：1 715-1 725.(XU Zhenhao，LI Shucai，LI Liping，et al. Construction permit mechanism of karst tunnels based on dynamic assessment and management of risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2011，33(11)：1 715-1 725.(in Chinese))
[14]	李连崇，唐春安，左宇军，等. 煤层底板下隐伏陷落柱的滞后突水机制[J]. 煤炭学报，2009，34(9)：1 212-1 216.(LI Lianchong，TANG Chun?an，ZUO Yujun，et al. Mechanism of hysteretic ground water inrush from coal seam floor with karstic collapse columns[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2009，34(9)：1 212-1 216.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[3]	赵阳升，胡耀青. 承压水上采煤理论与技术[M]. 北京：煤炭工业出版社，2004. " target="_blank">
[4]	李白英. 预防矿井底板突水的“下三带”理论及其发展与应用[J]. 山东矿业学院学报：自然科学版，1999，18(4)：11-18.(LI Baiying. “Down three zones”in the prediction of the water inrush from coalbed floor aquifer theory，development and application[J]. Journal of Shandong Institute of Mining and Technology：Natural Science，1999，18(4)：11-18.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[6]	刘天泉. 矿山岩体采动影响与控制工程学及其应用[J]. 煤炭学报，1995，20(1)：1-5. (LIU Tianquan. Influence of mining activities on mine rock mass and control engineering[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，1995，20(1)：1-5.(in Chinese))
[8]	施龙青，韩进. 开采煤层底板“四带”划分理论与实践[J]. 中国矿业大学学报，2005，34(1)：16-23.(SHI Longqing，HAN Jin. Theory and practice of dividing coal mining area floor into four-zone[J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology，2005，34(1)：16-23.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[9]	施龙青. 底板突水机制研究综述[J]. 山东科技大学学报：自然科学版，2009，28(3)：17-22.(SHI Longqing. Summary of study of mechanism of water-inrush from seam floor[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology：Natural Science，2009，28(3)：17-22.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[12]	左宇军，李术才，秦泗凤，等. 动力扰动诱发承压水底板关键层失稳的突变理论研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(8)：2 361-2 366.(ZUO Yujun，LI Shucai，QIN Sifeng，et al. A catastrophe model for floor water-resisting key stratum instability induced by dynamic disturbance[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(8)：2 361-2 362.(in Chinese))
[13]	李连崇，唐春安，梁正召，等. 含断层煤层底板突水通道形成过程的仿真分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(2)：290-297.(LI Lianchong，TANG Chun?an，LIANG Zhengzhao，et al. Numerical analysis of pathway formation of groundwater inrush from faults in coal seam floor[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(2)：290-297.(in Chinese))
[15]	徐智敏，孙亚军，巩思园，等. 高承压水上采煤底板突水通道形成的监测与数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(8)：1 698-1 704.(XU Zhimin，SUN Yajun，GONG Siyuan，et al. Monitoring and numerical simulation of formation of water inrush pathway caused by coal ming above confined water with high pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(8)：1 698-1 704.(in Chinese))
[17]	李仲奎，卢达溶，中山元. 三维模型试验新技术及其在大型地下洞群研究中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2003，22(9)：1 430-1 436. (LI Zhongkui，LU Darong，NAKAYAMA H. Development and application of new technology to 3D geomechanical model test of large underground houses[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2003，22(9)：1 430-1 436.(in Chinese))
[18]	刘爱华，彭述权，李夕兵，等. 深部开采承压突水机制相似物理模型试验系统研制及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(7)：1 335-1 341.(LIU Aihua，PENG Shuquan，LI Xibing，et al. Development and application of similar physical model experiment system for water inrush mechanism in deep mining[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2009，28(7)：1 335-1 341.(in Chinese))
[20]	李术才，周毅，李利平，等. 地下工程流-固耦合模型试验新型相似材料的研制及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(6)：1 128-1 137.(LI Shucai，ZHOU Yi，LI Liping，et al. Research of a new similar material for underground engineering fluid-solid coupling model test and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(6)：1 128-1 137.(in Chinese)) " target="_blank">
[22]	李术才，宋曙光，李利平，等. 海底隧道流固耦合模型试验系统的研制及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2013，32(5)：883-890.(LI Shucai，SONG Shuguang，LI Liping，et al. Development on subsea tunnel model test system for solid-fluid coupling and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2013，32(5)：883-890.(in Chinese))
[21]	张强勇，段抗，向文，等. 极端风险因素影响的深部层状盐岩地下储气库群运营稳定三维流变模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(9)：1 766-1 775.(ZHANG Qiangyong，DUAN Kang，XIANG Wen，et al. Three dimensional rheological model test study of operational stability of deep laminated salt rock gas storage group under influence of extreme risk factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(9)：1 766-1 775.(in Chinese))