基于滑体与受灾体共同作用的冲击能计算模型

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1540 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要滑坡冲击能计算是准确评估受灾体易损性的重要依据。对滑坡致灾过程能耗机制分析发现，滑体在下滑及冲击受灾体过程中，由于内部崩解碰撞将会耗散部分能量。基于滑体与受灾体冲击过程能耗机制提出冲击能计算方程组。结合实际，采用斜率为滑体变形模量的斜线逼近滑体真实变形曲线，将受灾体简化为弹性悬臂梁，从而在冲击能计算方程的基础上推导出滑体冲击能简化计算模型。同时提出一种能直观反映冲击能大小的指标，称之为冲击效应系数。该系数反映出冲击能和滑体内部耗能是由受灾体与滑体变形特性共同决定的。受灾体相对滑体越坚固，冲击效应系数越大，则冲击能越小，滑体内部耗能越大；受灾体相对滑体越脆弱，冲击效应系数越小，则冲击能越大，滑体内部耗能越小。结合工程实例，介绍冲击能简化计算步骤。最后通过实例表明冲击过程中滑体内部将会耗散绝大部分能量，与前期模型实验反映的规律在定性上是一致的。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴越1
	刘东升2
	李硕洋3

关键词 ：边坡工程, 滑坡, 风险评估, 易损性, 冲击能

Abstract：Impact energy is an important basis for landslide vulnerability assessment. Internal collapse of landslide mass dissipates part of the kinetic energy in the process of landslide. Calculation equations of impact energy are proposed based on the study of interaction mechanism between landslide mass and disaster-affected bodies. Based on the equations，a simplified model for impact energy calculation is put forward. At the same time，a coefficient of impact effect is defined，which can reflect the impact energy intuitively. The coefficient of impact effect indicates that the impact energy and internal energy dissipation of landslide mass are determined together by the characteristics of landslide and disaster-affected bodies. Increment in the coefficient of impact effect means that the impact energy decreases and the internal energy dissipation of landslide mass increases；and vice versa. The results of case study show that the impact energy calculated by the simplified model is consistent with those obtained by experiments，and it is more accurate than the result calculated by the method without consideration of the internal energy dissipation.

Key words： slope engineering landslide risk assessment vulnerability impact energy

引用本文:

吴越1，刘东升2，李硕洋3. 基于滑体与受灾体共同作用的冲击能计算模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(S1): 2636-2643.
WU Yue1，LIU Dongsheng2，LI Shuoyang3. CALCULATION MODEL OF IMPACT ENERGY BASED ON INTERACTION OF LANDSLIDE MASS AND DISASTER-AFFECTED BODIES. , 2012, 31(S1): 2636-2643.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2012/V31/IS1/2636

[1] Australian Geomechanics Society(AGS). A national landslide risk management framework for Australia[J]. Australian Geomechanics，2007，42(1)：1–12.

[2] KAYNIA A M，PAPATHOMA-KÖHLE K M，NEUHÄUSER B，et al. Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide：application to the village of Lichtenstein，Baden-Württemberg，Germany[J]. Engineering Geology，2008，101(1/2)：33–48.

[3] UZIELLI M，NADIM F，LACASSE S，et al. A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides[J]. Engineering Geology，2008，102(3/4)：251–256.

[4] VAN WESTEN C J，VAN ASCH T W J，SOETERS R. Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it stil1 so difficult?[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment，2005，65(2)：167–184.

[5] FELL R，COROMINAS J，BONNARD C，et al. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility，hazard and risk zoning for land use planning[J]. Engineering Geology，2008，102(3/4)：85–98.

[6] FELL R，LACASSE S，LEROI E. A framework for landslide risk assessment and management[C]//Landslide Risk Management—A. London：Taylor and Francis，2005：3–26.

[7] 吴越，刘东升，陆新，等. 单体滑坡灾害财产风险定量评估模型[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(增2)：342–348.(WU Yue，LIU Dongsheng，LU Xin，et al. A quantitative assessment model for property risk caused by single landslide[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2010，31(Supp.2)：342–348.(in Chinese))

[8] 吴越，刘东升，陆新，等. 基于功–能关系的滑坡典型受灾体易损性评估模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(增1)：2 946– 2 953.(WU Yue，LIU Dongsheng，LU Xin，et al. A quantitative vulnerability assessment model for typical element at landslide risk based on work-energy transformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(Supp.1)：2 946–2 953.(in Chinese))

[9] 张倬元，王士天，王兰生. 工程地质分析原理[M]. 北京：地质出版社，1994：338–339.(ZHANG Zhuoyuan，WANG Shitian，WANG Lansheng. Principles of engineering geology analysis[M]. Beijing：Geological Publishing House，1994：338–339.(in Chinese))

[10] 潘家铮. 建筑物的抗滑稳定和滑坡分析[M]. 北京：中国水利水电出版社，1980：120–129.(PAN Jiazheng. Stability against sliding of building and landslide analysis[M]. Beijing：China Water Power Press，1980：120–129.(in Chinese))

[11] 吴越，刘东升，李明军. 滑体下滑及冲击受灾体过程中的能耗规律模型实验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2011，30(4)：693–701.(WU Yue，LIU Dongsheng，LI Mingjun. Landslide model experimental of energy dissipation principle in the sliding and impact process[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2011，30(4)：693–701.(in Chinese))

[12] 李东升，刘东燕. 边坡防灾工程风险决策分析[J]. 重庆大学学报：自然科学版，2005，28(12)：104–107.(LI Dongsheng，LIU Dongyan. Risk decision-making method of slope resistant engineering[J]. Journal of Chongqing University：Natural Science，2005，28(12)：104–107. (in Chinese))

[13] 中国船舶工业总公司第九设计院. 弹性地基梁及矩形板计算[M]. 北京：国防工业出版社，1983：294–296.(The 9th Design Institute of China State Shipbuilding Corporation. Calculations of elastic foundation beam and rectangular plate[M]. Beijing：National Defense Industry Press，1983：294–296.(in Chinese))

[14] 李广信. 高等土力学[M]. 北京：清华大学出版社，2004：20.(LI Guangxin. Advanced soil mechanics[M]. Beijing：Tsinghua University Press，2004：20.(in Chinese))

[15] 何思明，吴永，沈均. 泥石流大块石冲击力的简化计算[J]. 自然灾害学报，2009，18(5)：51–56.(HE Siming，WU Yong，SHEN Jun. Simplified calculation of impact force of massive stone in debris[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters，2009，18(5)：51–56.(in Chinses))

[16] 吴越，刘东升，陆新，等. 滑坡灾害典型受灾体失效概率计算方法及应用[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程，2011，33(2)：45–50.(WU Yue，LIU Dongsheng，LU Xin，et al. A calculation for failure probability of typical element at landslide risk[J]. Journal of Civil， Architectural and Environmental Engineering，2011，33(2)：45–50.(in Chinese))