基于小波变换的黄土滑坡动土压力响应及其频谱特性研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0107

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (5398 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要为了探讨黄土边坡在地震作用下动土压力沿高程和滑面的频谱特性响应规律，通过大型振动台实验输入X向和Z向地震波，并逐级加载直到边坡破坏，获取沿高程和滑面附近5个传感器的动土压力曲线，并利用基于小波变换的小波包分析工具将动土压力时域曲线分解，结果表明：(1) 输入EL-Centro波逐级加载过程中，各测点动土压力响应效果显著，在强大惯性力的作用下，动土压力峰值不断增大，动土压力沿高程向上呈现不断减小的趋势；(2) 土压力沿滑面从坡脚到坡体内部呈现不断增大的趋势，S–1与S–3测点之间的直线斜率大于S–3与S–5测点之间的直线斜率，说明加载过程中滑坡前部围岩一直保持挤密状态，而后部S–5测点更容易受干扰因素影响造成土压力值变化；(3) 第一频带小波分量(0.1～6.26 Hz)和第二频带小波分量(6.26～12.51 Hz)的低频地震应力波对动土压力影响最为突出，黄土斜坡对高频波的吸收效果较好；(4) 各通道第一频段和第二频段动土压力曲线与实测曲线规律相近，第三～第八频段规律相差较大，低频波在动土压力响应中起主导作用，黄土边坡对地震波沿高程运动过程中高频部分具有“滤波作用”。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	施艳秋1
	谢显龙2
	3
	张玘恺4
	蒋翰3
	彭嘉骏3
	廖昕3

关键词 ：边坡工程, 黄土边坡, 动土压力, 频谱特性, 振动台, 滑面, 高程, 小波变换

Abstract：In order to investigate the response spectrum characteristics of the dynamic soil pressure along the elevation and sliding surface of loess slopes under the action of earthquake，large-scale shaking table experiments were performed by progressively loading X-direction and Z-direction seismic waves until failure of the slope. The dynamic soil pressure curves of 5 sensors along the elevation and near the sliding surface were obtained，and the time-domain curve of the dynamic soil pressure was decomposed by using wavelet transform. The results show that，in the process of step loading through inputting EL-Centro wave，the response of the dynamic soil pressure at each measurement point is significant，and that the peak value of the dynamic soil pressure is increasing under the action of the inertial force while the dynamic soil pressure is decreasing along the elevation. The soil pressure is increasing from the foot to the inside of the slope along the sliding surface，The slope of the straight line between the measuring points S–1 and S–3 is greater than that between the measuring points S–3 and S–5，indicating that，in the loading process，the front of the landslide maintains compaction state while the S–5 point in the rear is more likely to be disturbed. The low-frequency seismic stress wave of the wavelet components of the first frequency band(0.1 to 6.26 Hz) and the second frequency band(6.26 to 12.51 Hz) has the most significant effect on the dynamic earth pressure，playing a leading role in the response of the earth pressure. The dynamic earth pressure curves under the first and second frequency bands of each channel are similar to the measured curves，while them are quite different from each other under the third and eighth frequency bands. The low-frequency wave plays a dominant role in the response to the soil pressure，and the loess slope has a "filtering effect" on the high-frequency part of the seismic wave moving along the elevation.

Key words： slope engineering loess slopes dynamic earth pressure spectrum characteristics shaking table sliding surface elevation wavelet transform

引用本文:

施艳秋1，谢显龙2，3，张玘恺4，蒋翰3，彭嘉骏3，廖昕3. 基于小波变换的黄土滑坡动土压力响应及其频谱特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(12): 2570-2581.
SHI Yanqiu1，XIE Xianlong2，3，ZHANG Qikai4，JIANG Han3，PENG Jiajun3，LIAO Xin3. Study on spectrum characteristics of dynamic earth pressure of loess landslides based on wavelet transform. , 2020, 39(12): 2570-2581.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0107 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2020/V39/I12/2570

[2]	叶海林，郑颖人，杜修力，等. 边坡动力破坏特征的振动台模型试验与数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报，2012，59(9)：136-143.(YE Hailin，ZHENG Yingren，DU Xiuli，et al. Shaking table model test and numerical analysis of dynamic failure characteristics of slope[J]. Journal of civil engineering，2012，59(9)：136-143.(in Chinese))
[4]	高春华，纪金豹，闫维明. 地震模拟振动台技术在中国的发展[J]. 土木工程学报，2014，61(8)：9-19.(GAO Chunhua，JI Jinbao，YAN Weiming. Development of seismic simulation shaking table technology in China[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering，2014，61(8)：9-19.(in Chinese))
[10]	SteWART D P，JEWELL R J，RANDOLPH M F. Centrifuge Modelling of Piled Bridge Abutments on Soft Ground[J]. Soils and Foundations，1994，34(1)：41-51.
[12]	郑颖人. 岩土数值极限分析方法的发展与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2012，31(7)：1 297-1 316.(ZHENG Yingren. Development and application of numerical limit analysis method of geotechnical engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2012，31(7)：1 297-1 316.(in Chinese))
[14]	刘汉香，许强，朱星. 含软弱夹层斜坡地震动力响应过程的边际谱特征研究[J]. 岩土力学，2019，40(4)：1 387-1 396.(LIU Hanxiang，XU Qiang，ZHU Xing. Marginal spectral characteristics of seismic dynamic response of slopes with weak interlayers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics，2019，40(4)：1 387-1 396.(in Chinese))
[20]	武志信，吴红刚，赖天文，等. 微型桩加固土质边坡的加速度响应及其频谱特性研究[J]. 铁道学报，2020，42(3)：129-138.(WU Zhixin，WU Honggang，LAI Tianwen. Acceleration response and spectral characteristics of reinforced soil slope with micro-piles[J]. Acta Railway Sinica，2020，42(3)：129-138.(in Chinese))
[22]	王秋懿，吴红刚，张金江，等. BFRP锚杆加固斜坡对地震动的响应特征——以功东高速响水河边坡为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报，2020，31(2)：94-101.(WANG Qiuyi，WU Honggang，ZHANG Jinjiang，et al. Response characteristics of slope reinforced by BFRP anchor to ground motion：a case study of Xiangshui river slope on Gongdong Expressway[J]. Chinese Journal of Geological Hazards and Prevention，2020，31(2)：94-101.(in Chinese))
[24]	李玉瑞. 陕北黄土边坡失稳变形机制试验研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 兰州：兰州交通大学，2019.(LI Yurui. Experimental study on instability and deformation mechanism of loess slope in Northern Shaanxi[M. S. Thesis][D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou Jiaotong University，2019.(in Chinese))
[7]	ZHANG M，LIU J. Controlling factors of loess landslides in western China[J]. Environmental Geology，2010，59(8)：1 671-1 680.
[17]	赖杰，郑颖人，阿比尔的. 岩土动力极限应变判据在边坡稳定分析中的应用[J]. 振动与冲击，2016，35(17)：13-18.(LAI Jie，ZHENG Yingren，ABIR. Application of limit strain criterion of geotechnical dynamics in slope stability analysis[J]. Vibration and impact，2016，35(17)：13-18.(in Chinese))
[27]	张德丰. 详解MATLAB数字信号处理[M]. 北京：电子工业出版社，2010：114-149.(ZHANG Defeng. Detailed explanation of matlab digital signal processing[M]. Beijing：Electronic Industry Press，2010：114-149.(in Chinese))
[5]	聂林，杨涛，马惠民. 基于滑动机制分析的滑带强度参数反演[J]. 工程地质学报，2012，20(1)：15-20.(NIE Lin，YANG Tao，MA Huimin. Inversion of strength parameters of sliding zone based on analysis of sliding mechanism[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology，2012，20(1)：15-20.(in Chinese))
[8]	张泽林，吴树仁，王涛. 地震作用下黄土滑坡加速度深度放大效应及震后变形模式研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2018，51(4)：102-110. (ZHANG Zelin，WU Shuren，WANG Tao. Study on acceleration depth amplification effect and post earthquake deformation mode of loess landslide under earthquake action[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering，2018，51(4)：102-110.(in Chinese))
[15]	许强，刘汉香，邹威. 斜坡加速度动力响应特性的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2010，29(12)：2 420-2 428. (XU Qiang，LIU Hanxiang，ZOU Wei. Large scale shaking table test study on acceleration dynamic response characteristics of slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2010，29(12)：2 420-2 428. (in Chinese))
[18]	郑颖人，叶海林，肖强. 基于全动力分析法的地震边坡与隧道稳定性分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报，2010，30(增1)：279-285. (ZHENG Yingren，YE Hailin，XIAO Qiang. Stability analysis of earthquake slope and tunnel based on full dynamic analysis method[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering，2010，30(Supp.1)：279-285.(in Chinese))
[25]	吴道勇. 玉树地震作用下松散堆积层缓斜坡变形机制研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 兰州：兰州交通大学，2013.(WU Daoyong. Study on the deformation mechanism of loose accumulative layer and gentle slope under Yushu earthquake[M. S. Thesis][D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou Jiaotong University，2013.(in Chinese))
[3]	LIN M L，WANG K L. Seismic slope behavior in a large-scale shaking table model test[J]. Engineering Geology，2006，86(2)：118-133.
[13]	王猛，梁庆国，王丽丽. 黄土隧道边仰坡动力响应的大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动，2019，39(2)：141-150. (WANG Meng，LIANG Qingguo，WANG Lili. Large-scale shaking table model test on the dynamic response of the slope on the loess tunnel[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration，2019，39(2)：141-150.(in Chinese))
[23]	牌立芳. 山区机场高填方边坡组合支护结构体系的协同工作性能研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 兰州：兰州交通大学，2019.(PAI Lifang. Study on cooperative performance of combined support structure system for high fill slope of airport in mountainous area[M. S. Thesis][D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou Jiaotong University，2019.(in Chinese))
[1]	LIAO L，YANG J S，ZHANG D N. Geodynamic simulation of the Wenchuan Ms8.0 and Lushan Ms7.0 earthquakes[J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics，2019，10(1)：49-57.
[6]	裴向军，袁广，张晓超. 坡脚开挖诱发滑坡机制——以沙井驿滑坡为例[J]. 山地学报，2017，35(2)：77-84.(PEI Xiangjun，YUAN Guang，ZHANG Xiaochao. Mechanism of landslide induced by slope toe excavation-Taking shajingyi landslide as an example[J]. Journal of Mountain Science，2017，35(2)：77-84.(in Chinese))
[9]	蒋关鲁，王力伟. 基于离心模型试验的路桥变形耦合特性数值模拟研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2012，59(8)：148-157.(JIANG Guanlu，WANG Liwei. Numerical simulation of deformation coupling characteristics of road and Bridge Based on centrifugal model test[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering，2012，59(8)：148-157.(in Chinese))
[11]	YINGREN Z，CHUJIAN D，SHANGYI Z，et al. Development of finite element limiting analysis method and its applications in geotechnical engineering[J]. Engineering Sciences，2007，87(3)：12-38.
[16]	许强，黄润秋. “5·12”汶川大地震诱发大型崩滑灾害动力特征初探[C]// 汶川大地震工程震害调查分析与研究. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2009：225-232.(XU Qiang，HUANG Runqiu. Preliminary study on the dynamic characteristics of large-scale landslide disaster induced by "5.12" Wenchuan earthquake[C]// Investigation，Analysis and Research on Earthquake Damage of Wenchuan Earthquake Project. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2009：225-232. (in Chinese))
[19]	武志信，吴红刚，赖天文，等. 微型桩加固土质边坡的动土压力响应及其频谱特性研究[J]. 岩土力学，2019，40(10)：3 909-3 919. WU Zhixin，WU Honggang，LAI Tianwen，et al. Study on dynamic pressure response and spectral characteristics of soil slope reinforced with micro-piles[J]. Rock and soil mechanics，2019，40(10)：3 909- 3 919.(in Chinese))
[21]	崔臻，盛谦，刘加进. 基于小波包的地下洞室群地震响应及其频谱特性研究[J]. 岩土力学，2010，31(12)：3 901-3 906.(CUI Zhen，SHENG Qian，LIU Jiajin. Study on seismic response and spectral characteristics of underground caverns based on wavelet packet[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanic，2010，31(12)：3 901-3 906.(in Chinese))
[26]	杜剑，毛毳，林贝贝. 地震波信号的小波包分解及能量分布特征[J]. 天津城建大学学报，2017，23(3)：183-187.(DU Jian，MAO Chen，LIN Beibei. Wavelet packet decomposition and energy distribution characteristics of seismic signal[J]. Journal of Tianjin Urban Construction University，2017，23(3)：183-187.(in Chinese))