基于双层Winkler地基的盾构穿越管线挠曲与脱空分析

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2023.0748

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1520 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要盾构掘进诱发上覆管线的挠曲和脱空分析对其结构保护至关重要。基于双层Winkler地基并考虑管线上覆与下卧地基刚度差异，对盾构隧道开挖上覆管线挠曲和脱空进行理论与模型试验证实分析。基于荷载板试验对传统管线砂土地基承载理论加以修正，提出适用于盾构穿越管土相互作用分析的砂土地基刚度和极限承载力取值建议。参数分析发现，管线脱空宽度随管线抗弯刚度和隧道开挖地层损失增大而变大，但变化速率递减；当地层损失或管线抗弯刚度较大时，管土线弹性相互作用理论和考虑界面脱空的单层地基计算方法均高估了管线挠曲和弯矩，而考虑界面脱空的双层Winkler地基计算方法可更准确地预估管线挠曲。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：隧道工程, 双层Winkler地基, 盾构掘进, 管土相互作用, 界面脱空, 模型试验, 地基承载理论

Abstract：The assessment of deflection and voiding resulting from shield tunnelling on overlying pipelines is critical for safeguarding their structural integrity. A method for calculating such deflection and voiding during shield tunnel excavation，taking into account variations in stiffness between the pipeline?s overlying and underlying subgrades，was developed using a double-layer Winkler foundation model. Model tests verified its applicability. Conventional subgrade bearing theories for pipelines buried in sand were refined based on plate load tests，providing recommendations for stiffness and ultimate bearing capacity relevant to soil-pipeline interaction during shield tunnelling. Parameter analysis revealed that void width increases with pipeline flexural stiffness and tunneling ground loss，albeit at a decreasing rate. Significantly，under conditions of high ground loss or pipeline flexural stiffness，both the soil-pipeline elastic interaction theory and the single-layer foundation method，considering interface voiding，tend to overestimate pipeline deflection and bending moments. In contrast，the double-layer Winkler foundation method，incorporating interface voiding，delivers a more precise prediction of pipeline deflections.

Key words： tunnel engineering double-layer Winkler foundation shield tunnelling pipe-soil interaction interface gap formation model test subgrade bearing theory

引用本文:

林存刚1，2，3，4，王忠杰1，2，3，4，郭成超1，2，3，4，王复明1，2，3，4，陈瑜1，2，3，4，赵辰洋1，2，3，丁智5. 基于双层Winkler地基的盾构穿越管线挠曲与脱空分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(5): 1270-1281.
LIN Cungang1，2，3，4，WANG Zhongjie1，2，3，4，GUO Chengchao1，2，3，4，WANG Fuming1，2，3，4，. Analysis of pipeline deflection and gap formation induced by shield tunnelling based on double-layer Winkler foundation. , 2024, 43(5): 1270-1281.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2023.0748 或 https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2024/V43/I5/1270

[1] 林存刚，黄茂松. 基于Pasternak地基的盾构隧道开挖非连续地下管线的挠曲[J]. 岩土工程学报，2019，41(7)：1 200–1 207.(LIN Cungang，HUANG Maosong. Deflections of discontinuous buried pipelines induced by shield tunnelling based on Pasternak foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering，2019，41(7)：1 200–1 207.(in Chinese))
[2] ATTEWELL P B，YEATES J，SELBY A R. Soil movements induced by tunnelling and their effects on pipelines and structures[M]. New York：Chapman and Hall，1986：10–58.
[3] KLAR A，VORSTER T，SOGA K，et al. Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling：comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions[J]. Géotechnique，2005，55(6)：461–466.
[4] KLAR A，MARSHALL A M. Linear elastic tunnel pipeline interaction：the existence and consequence of volume loss equality[J]. Géotechnique，2015，65(9)：788–792.
[5] LIN C G，HUANG M S，NADIM F，et al. Tunnelling-induced response of buried pipelines and their effects on ground settlements[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2020，96：103193.
[6] LIN C G，HUANG M S. Tunnelling-induced response of a jointed pipeline and its equivalence to a continuous structure[J]. Soils and Foundations，2019，59：828–839.
[7] LIN C G，HUANG M S，NADIM F，et al. Analytical solutions for tunneling-induced response of two overlying pipelines[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2021，108：103678.
[8] LIN C G，ZHENG J J，YE Y W，et al. Analytical solution for tunnelling-induced response of an overlying pipeline considering gap formation[J]. Underground Space，2024，15：298–311.
[9] MARSHALL A M，KLAR A，MAIR R. Tunneling beneath buried pipes：view of soil strain and its effect on pipeline behavior [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2010，136(12)：1 664–1 672.
[10] VORSTER T E B，KLAR A，SOGA K，et al. Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2005，131(11)：1 399–1 410.
[11] KLAR A，ELKAYAM I，MARSHALL A M. Design oriented linear-equivalent approach for evaluating the effect of tunneling on pipelines[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2016，142(1)：04015062.
[12] KLAR A，VORSTER T，SOGA K，et al. Elastoplastic solution for soil-pipe-tunnel interaction[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2007，133(7)：782–792.
[13] LIU M，ORTEGA R. Assessment of impact to buried pipelines due to tunneling-induced settlement[J]. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice，2023，14(3)：04023020.
[14] 程霖. 地铁隧道开挖引起地下管线变形的理论分析和试验研究[博士学位论文][D]. 北京：北京交通大学，2021.(CHENG Lin. Theoretical analysis and experimental research on deformation of buried pipelines due to subway tunnel excavation[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Beijing：Beijing Jiaotong University，2021.(in Chinese))
[15] 程霖，杨成永，马文辉，等. 地铁隧道开挖引起的管线变形计算与试验研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报：自然科学版，2022，50(4)： 7–13.(CHENG Lin，YANG Chengyong，MA Wenhui，et al. Deformation calculation and experimental study on buried pipes induced by subway tunnel excavation[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology：Natural Science，2022，50(4)：7–13.(in Chinese))
[16] 付大喜，杨明辉，郑彬彬. 浅埋隧道开挖诱发上覆管道管底脱开范围求解及判定[J]. 工程力学，2023，DOI：http：//kns.cnki.net/kcms/ detail/11.2595.O3.20230616.1614.004.html.(FU Daxi，YANG Minghui，ZHENG Binbin. Solution and determination of overlying pipe-soil void range induced by shallow tunnel excavation[J]. Engineering Mechanics，2023，DOI：http：//kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2595. O3.20230616.1614.004.html.(in Chinese))
[17] LIU X，JIANG A，HAI L，et al. Study on soil gap formation beneath existing underground structures due to new excavation below[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2021，139：104379.
[18] LIU X，ZHANG R，JIANG A，et al. Mechanical behaviors and soil gap formation of existing pipeline based on large-deformation theory[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics，2023，23(7)：04023098.
[19] WANG Y，SHI J W，NG C W W. Numerical modeling of tunneling effect on buried pipelines [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2011，48(7)：1 125–1 137.
[20] SHI J W，CHEN Y H，LU H，et al. Centrifuge modeling of the influence of joint stiffness on pipeline response to underneath tunnel excavation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2022，59(9)：1 568– 1 586.
[21] SHI J，WANG Y，NG C W. Numerical parametric study of tunneling-induced joint rotation angle in jointed pipelines[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2016，53(12)：2 058–2 071.
[22] SHI J W，WANG Y，NG C W W. Three-dimensional centrifuge modeling of ground and pipeline response to tunnel excavation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2016，142(11)：04016054.
[23] ASCE Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifeline. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems[M]. New York：American Society of Civil Engineers，1984：170–176.
[24] C-CORE，D.G. Honegger Consulting，SSD，Inc. Guidelines for constructing natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines through areas prone to landslide and subsidence hazards[R]. Washington：Design，Materials，and Construction Committee of Pipeline Research Council International，Inc.，2009.
[25] O?ROURKE M J，LIU X. Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects[M]. New York：Mceer，1999：81–84.
[26] YU J，ZHANG C R，HUANG M S. Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling：assessment of Winkler modulus for underground pipelines[J]. Computers and Geotechnics，2013，50(5)：17–28.
[27] LIN C G，HUANG M S，NADIM F，et al. Embankment responses to shield tunnelling considering soil-structure interaction：case studies in Hangzhou soft ground[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology，2020，96：103230.
[28] POULOS H G，DAVIS E H. Pile foundation analysis and design [M]. New York：John Wiley and Sons，1980：181–188.
[29] 徐梦然. 盾构隧道开挖诱发既有管线变形研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 广州：中山大学，2022.(XU Mengran. Study on existing pipeline deformation induced by shield tunnel excavation[M. S. Thesis][D]. Guangzhou：Sun Yat-sen University，2022.(in Chinese))
[30] SAIYAR M，NI P，TAKE W A，et al. Response of pipelines of differing flexural stiffness to normal faulting[J]. Géotechnique，2016，66(4)：275–286.
[31] XIE X，SYMANS M D，O?ROURKE M J，et al. Numerical modeling of buried HDPE pipelines subjected to normal faulting：a case study[J]. Earthquake Spectra，2013，29(2)：609–632.
[32] O?ROURKE T D，JUNG J K，ARGYROU C. Underground pipeline response to earthquake-induced ground deformation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2016，91：272–283.
[33] JUNG J K，O?ROURKE T D，ARGYROU C. Multi-directional force-displacement response of underground pipe in sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2016，53(11)：1 763–1 781.