2025年8月11日 星期一
岩石力学与工程学报  2025, Vol. 44 Issue (1): 185-196    DOI: 10.3724/1000-6915.jrme.2024.0350
  学术论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
爆破挤淤填石地基沉降模型试验及预测分析
王  军1,2,3,冯  莹1,4,陈晟凯1,5,秦  伟1,2,5,张金荣1,倪俊峰1
(1. 温州大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 温州  325035;2. 浙江省软弱土地基与海涂围垦工程技术重点实验室,浙江 温州  325035;3. 滨海软土地基防灾减灾技术浙江省工程研究中心,浙江 温州  325035;4. 超软土工程技术与智能化监测浙江省国际科技合作基地,浙江 温州  325035;
5. 温州市交通压电工程技术重点实验室,浙江 温州  325035)
Settlement performance and prediction model of rock-filled subgrade constructed by explosive replacement method
WANG Jun1,2,3,FENG Ying1,4,CHEN Shengkai1,5,QIN Wei1,2,5,ZHANG Jinrong1,NI Junfeng1
(1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325035,China;2. Key Laboratory of Engineering and Technology for Soft Soil Foundation and Tideland Reclamation of Zhejiang Province,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325035,China;3. Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation for Coastal Soft Soil Foundation,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325035,China;4. Zhejiang International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of
Ultra-soft Soil Engineering and Smart Monitoring,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325035,China;5. Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Traffic Piezoelectric Engineering Technology,Wenzhou,Zhejiang 325035,China)
全文: PDF (2815 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 爆破挤淤法是处理滨海深厚软弱土地基的有效方法之一。为了探明爆破挤淤填石地基爆后沉降演化规律,开展爆破挤淤填石沉降模型试验,采用整式填石替代碎石,减少碎石沉降的随机性造成的测量误差。研究不同填石尺寸及爆破设计参数下填石地基的沉降特性,并开展沉降预测分析。研究结果表明:填石断面越宽或越高,爆后填石沉降越大,爆破挤淤置换处理的淤泥厚度越大,但沉降稳定的时间越长;炸药埋深越大,爆后填石沉降呈减小趋势,存在最佳的炸药埋深。结合国省干线S201(联七线)公路的现场实测结果,将决定系数、预测误差、最终沉降量作为模型有效性检验指标,提出用于预测爆后填石地基沉降的方法,并对比分析现场和试验沉降发挥特性,验证了预测模型的合理性,为相关工程实践提供技术指导。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王 军1
2
3
冯 莹1
4
陈晟凯1
5
秦 伟1
2
5
张金荣1
倪俊峰1
关键词 基础工程爆破挤淤法填石地基沉降分析预测方法    
Abstract:The explosive replacement method(ERM) is one of the effective methods to treat the deep soft soil in coastal area. The model tests of explosive replacement were carried out to investigate the post-explosion settlement evolution pattern,and a integrated rockfill was used to represent the crushed rock to reduce the measurement error caused by the randomness. The settlement behavior of the rockfill with different rockfill sizes and blasting design parameters was analyzed. Then,the settlement prediction methods were discussed. The research results indicate that the wider or higher the rockfill cross-section,the greater the post-explosion settlement of the rockfill,and the deeper the treated silt depth,but the longer the settlement stabilization delay. The greater the depth of explosive burial,the post-explosion settlement of rockfill tends to decrease. There is an optimal depth of explosive burial. Combining the results of field measurements of a subgrade project of S201 Trunk road of Nation and Province in Ningde,Fujian Province,China,the predicting method of post-explosive settlement of the subgrade was proposed by taking the coefficient of determination,prediction error,and final settlement as the indicators of the method validity assessment based on on-site measurements. The field and experimental settlement results were compared and analyzed to verify the reasonableness of the prediction model. The study can provide technical guidance for relevant engineering practice.
Key wordsfoundation engineering    explosive replacement method    rockfill subgrade    settlement analysis    prediction methods
    
引用本文:   
王 军1,2,3,冯 莹1,4,陈晟凯1,5,秦 伟1,2,5,张金荣1,倪俊峰1. 爆破挤淤填石地基沉降模型试验及预测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2025, 44(1): 185-196.
WANG Jun1,2,3,FENG Ying1,4,CHEN Shengkai1,5,QIN Wei1,2,5,ZHANG Jinrong1,NI Junfeng1. Settlement performance and prediction model of rock-filled subgrade constructed by explosive replacement method. , 2025, 44(1): 185-196.
链接本文:  
https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.3724/1000-6915.jrme.2024.0350      或      https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2025/V44/I1/185
版权所有 © 2005-2016 《岩石力学与工程学报》编辑部
   主办单位:中国岩石力学与工程学会 出版单位:科学出版社
地址:湖北省武汉市武昌小洪山(邮编:430071) 电话:(027)87199250 传真:(027)87199250 E-mail: rock@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:010-82358270,E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn
鄂公网安备 42010602003581号