基于黏聚裂纹模型的煤岩体韧性断裂机制研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2021.0548

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2495 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要传统线弹性断裂理论已不再适用于表征煤岩体韧性断裂特征，为了描述煤岩体I/II混合型裂纹扩展行为，通过I型半圆盘三点弯曲(SCB)实验和贯穿剪切(PTS)实验，构建基于PPR势能函数的泥岩及煤I/II混合型黏聚裂纹模型。实验结果表明：煤SCB试件峰值载荷后非线性损伤过程中，裂纹尖端张开位移(CTOD)增加量是泥岩试件的3.48倍；同时，通过数字图像相关方法(DIC)，测定煤岩试件中断裂过程区(FPZ)长度，其中煤试件的FPZ长度约为6.21 mm，是泥岩试件的2.75倍，这直接导致煤试件的韧性断裂破坏特征表现得更为显著。煤岩贯穿剪切(PTS)实验中，煤PTS试件的最大切向位移为0.055 mm，远大于泥岩试件的最大切向位移，表明煤PTS试件II型韧性断裂特征明显高于泥岩试件；此外，两类煤岩试件II型断裂能高于其I型断裂能，这说明发生II型剪切断裂需要消耗更多的能量。最后，进行煤岩体I/II混合型单边缺口梁(SENB)三点弯曲实验及与其相对应的数值模拟研究，数值模拟过程分别基于所建立的PPR黏聚裂纹模型和线弹性断裂理论。通过以上对比可知，相较于线弹性断裂理论，基于所建立的PPR黏聚裂纹模型的数值模拟结果更加符合实验结果，验证了所建立的PPR I/II混合型黏聚裂纹模型适合用于表征煤岩体I/II混合型韧性断裂行为。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨健锋1
	2
	柴敬1
	2
	张丁丁1
	2
	马哲1
	刘永亮1

关键词 ：岩石力学, 黏聚裂纹模型, 断裂过程区, 贯穿剪切实验, 韧性断裂, I/II混合型裂纹扩展

Abstract：Due to the traditional linear elastic fracture theory is no longer applicable to characterize the ductile fracture characteristics of coal and rock mass，the PPR unified potential-based cohesive crack model for mixed mode I/II fractures in mudstones and coals by using semi-circular specimen under three-point bending(SCB) tests and punch-through shear(PTS) tests to describe the I/II mixed crack propagation behavior in coal and rock mass. The experimental results show that the increase of crack tip opening displacement(CTOD) in the nonlinear damage process after load peak of the coal SCB specimen was 3.48 times that of the mudstone specimen. Meanwhile，the digital image correlation method(DIC) was used to measure the length of fracture process zone(FPZ) in the coal and mudstone specimens. The FPZ length of the coal SCB specimen was about 6.21 mm，which was 2.75 times that of the mudstone specimen. And the FPZ length of the coal SCB specimen can significantly cause a ductile fracture failure of the coal body. During the punch-through shear(PTS) experiments，the average maximum tangential displacement of PTS coal specimen is 0.055 mm，which is significantly larger than that of mudstone specimen，and the characteristics of the type II ductile fracture of PTS coal specimen are significantly higher than that of mudstone specimen. In addition，the pure mode II fracture energy of the two types of samples is higher than that of the pure mode I fracture energy，indicating that the occurrence of mode II shear fracture consumes more energy. Finally，the mixed mode I/II single-edge notched beam(SENB) through three-point bending test. And the corresponding numerical simulation were carried out for the coal and mudstone，which the numerical simulation process is based on the PPR cohesive crack model and the linear elastic fracture theory，respectively. Through a comparison with the linear elastic fracture theory，the numerical simulation results based on the PPR cohesive crack model are more in line with the experimental results. Therefore，the cohesive crack model that built in the study is suitable for characterizing the mixed mode I/II ductile fracture behavior of coal-rock mass.

Key words： rock mechanics cohesive crack model fracture process zone punch-through shear test ductile fracture I/II mixed model crack propagation

引用本文:

杨健锋1，2，柴敬1，2，张丁丁1，2，马哲1，刘永亮1. 基于黏聚裂纹模型的煤岩体韧性断裂机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(S2): 3014-3023.
YANG Jianfeng1，2，CHAI Jing1，2，ZHANG Dingding1，2，MA Zhe1，LIU Yongliang1. Study on ductile fracture mechanism of coal and rock mass based on cohesive crack model. , 2021, 40(S2): 3014-3023.

链接本文:

http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2021.0548 或 http://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2021/V40/IS2/3014

[14]	BARENBLATT G I. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture[M]. Advances in Applied Mechanics，1962，7：55-129.
[4]	朱飞昊，刘泽功，高魁，等. 构造带内巷道定向聚能爆破掘进围岩损伤特征试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2018，37(9)：2 037-2 047.(ZHU Feihao，LIU Zegong，GAO Kui，et al. Experimental study on rock damage of roadway excavation by cumulative blasting in structural coal[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2018，37(9)：2 037-2 047.(in Chinese))
[16]	周正峰，蒲卓桁，唐基华. 双线性黏聚区模型在混凝土路面损伤开裂分析中的应用[J]. 交通运输工程学报，2019，19(1)：17-23.(ZHOU Zhengfeng，PU Zhuoheng，TANG Jihua. Application of bilinear cohesive zone model in damage and cracking analysis of concrete pavemen[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering，2019，19(1)：17-23.(in Chinese))
[2]	唐世斌，张恒. 基于最大周向拉应变断裂准则的岩石裂纹水力压裂研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2016，35(增1)：2 710-2 719 (TANG Shibin，ZHANG Heng. Hydraulic fracture prediction theory based on the maximum tangential strain criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2016，35(Supp.1)：2 710-2 719.(in Chinese))
[12]	YANG S，XUA P，RANJITH P G. Damage model of coal under creep and triaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2015，80：337-345.
[22]	ZHANG Z，PAULINO G H. Cohesive zone modeling of dynamic failure in homogeneous and functionally graded materials[J]. International Jurnal of Plasticity，2005，21(6)：1 195-1 254.
[24]	FREED Y，BANKS-SILLS L. A new cohesive zone model for mixed mode interface fracture in biomaterials[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，2008，75(15)：4 583-4 593.
[9]	YANG J，LIAN H，LI L. Investigating the effect of confining pressure on fracture toughness of CO2-saturated coals[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，2021，242：107 496.
[19]	YANG J，LIAN H，LIANG W，et al. Model I cohesive zone models of different rank coals[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2019，115：145-156.
[5]	王成. 岩体边坡锚固的断裂力学原理[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2005，24(11)：1 900-1 904.(WANG Cheng. Fracture mechanics principles of anchorage for layered rock mass slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2005，24(11)：1 900- 1 904.(in Chinese))
[30]	BA?ANT Z P，PFEIFFER P A. Shear fracture tests of concrete[J]. Materials and Structures，1986，19(2)：111-121.
[3]	李金华，陈文晓，苏培莉，等. 深孔预裂强制放顶断裂力学模型研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探，2020，48(6)：217-223.(LI Jinhua，CHEN Wenxiao，SU Peili，et al. Research on the fracture mechanics model of deep hole pre-splitting for forced caving[J]. Coal Geology and Exploration，2020，48(6)：217-223.(in Chinese))
[7]	杨健锋，梁卫国，陈跃都，等. 不同水损伤程度下泥岩断裂力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2017，36(10)：2 431-2 440.(YANG Jianfeng，LIANG Weiguo，CHEN Yuedu，et al. Experiment research on the fracturing characteristics of mudstone with different degrees of water damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2017，36(10)：2 431-2 440.(in Chinese))
[8]	YANG J，LI L，LIAN H. Experimental evaluation of the influences of water on the fracture toughness of mudstones with bedding[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering，2019.
[10]	YANG J，LIAN H，LIANG W，et al. Experimental investigation of the effects of supercritical carbon dioxide on fracture toughness of bituminous coals[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2018，107：233-242.
[13]	BA?ANT Z P，KAZEMI M T. Determination of fracture energy，process zone length and brittleness number from size effect，with application to rock and concrete[J]. International Journal of Fracture，1990，44(2)：111-131.
[18]	GONG B，PAGGI M，CARPINTERI A. A cohesive crack model coupled with damage for interface fatigue problems[J]. International Journal of Fracture，2012，173(2)：91-104.
[20]	YANG J，LIAN H，LI L. Fracturing in coals with different fluids：an experimental comparison between water，liquid CO2 and supercritical CO2[J]. Scientific Reports，2020，10(1)：1-15.
[23]	VAN DEN BOSCH M J，SCHREURS P J G，GEERS M G D. An improved description of the exponential Xu and Needleman cohesive zone law for mixed-mode decohesion[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，2006，73(9)：1 220-1 234.
[28]	柴敬，杨玉玉，欧阳一博，等. 场覆岩变形破坏模拟试验的光测方法对比[J].煤炭学报，2021，46(1)：154-163.(CHAI Jing，YANG Yuyu，OUYANG Yibo，et al. Comparison of optical measurement methods for deformation and failure simulation test of overburden in working face[J]. Journal of China Coal Society，2021，46(1)：154-163.(in Chinese))
[11]	YANG C，DAEMEN J J K，YIN J. Experimental investigation of creep behavior of salt rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，1999，36(2)：233-242.
[15]	HILLERBORG A，MODÉER M，PETERSSON P E. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements[J]. Cement and Concrete Research，1976，6(6)：773-781.
[17]	ZHANG W，TABIEI A. Improvement of an exponential cohesive zone model for fatigue analysis[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention，2018，18(3)：607-618.
[21]	YANG Q，THOULESS M D. Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints[J]. International Journal of Fracture，2001，110(2)：175-187.
[25]	NEEDLEMAN A. An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids，1990，38(3)：289-324.
[27]	PARK K，PAULINO G H，ROESLER J R. A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids，2009，57(6)：891-908.
[26]	XU X P，NEEDLEMAN A. Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix[J]. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering，1993，1(2)：111-132.
[29]	LIN Q，YUAN H，BIOLZI L，et al. Opening and mixed mode fracture processes in a quasi-brittle material via digital imaging[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，2014，131：176-193.
[31]	CHEN Y，ZHAO Z. Correlation between shear induced asperity degradation and acoustic emission energy in single granite fracture[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics，2020，235：107 184.
[32]	BACKERS T，STEPHANSSON O，RYBACKI E. Rock fracture toughness testing in Mode II—punch-through shear test[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 2002，39(6)：755-769.
[33]	BORDAS S，NGUYEN P V，DUNANT C，et al. An extended finite element library[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering，2007，71(6)：703-732.
[1]	ATKINSON B K. Fracture Mechanics of Rock[M]. [S. l.]：Elsevier，1987：166-189
[6]	IRWIN G R. Crack-extension force for a part-through crack in a plate[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics，1962，29(4)：651-654.