简谐波作用下加筋土挡墙动土压力模型试验研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0925

摘要
图/表
参考文献(30)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (355 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

动荷载作用下，惯性力与动土压力对加筋土挡墙的稳定性影响显著。尽管现有计算方法对地震荷载下加筋土挡墙的动土压力计算进行规定和建议，但大量工程实践表明，现有计算方法设计保守性问题却十分突出并且各方法之间存在较大差异。为了研究动荷载下加筋土挡墙的动土压力，采用简谐波加载的方式进行一组振动台模型试验。根据测试数值的时程记录，分析实测动土压力与现有计算解的异同，主要得到以下结论：当动土压力达到峰值时，墙体面板产生向墙背填土方向的位移，因而峰值土压力不能直接用于分析动荷载下墙体的主动破坏；惯性力与动土压力并非同时达到极值点，两者之间存在相位差；实测动土压力沿墙高的分布形式及合力作用点分别与M-O法、S-W法类似，并且测试值远小于计算值；在墙体达到主动状态时，筋材末端土压力为负值，即简谐荷载下动土压力小于静止时的土压力。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	徐鹏1
	2
	蒋关鲁1
	2
	任世杰1
	廖丹2
	王智猛3

关键词 ：路基工程, 加筋土挡墙, 动荷载, 动土压力, 简谐波, 主动状态, 相位

Abstract：

Inertia force and dynamic earth pressure have remarkable influence on the stability of reinforced soil retaining walls under dynamic loading. Although the existing calculation methods provide rules and suggestions for calculation of the dynamic earth pressure of reinforced soil retaining walls under dynamic loading，a large number of engineering practices show that the methods are excessively conservative and they are distinctly different from each other. In order to study the dynamic earth pressure of reinforced soil retaining walls under dynamic loading，a shaking table model test was carried out by harmonic wave loading. According to the time history of values recorded during the test， similarities and differences between values tested and calculated by the current methods were analyzed. The following conclusions have been obtained：because when the earth pressure reaches peak values，the wall facing moves back to the fillings，so the peak values cannot be directly used to analyze the active failure of the wall under dynamic loading；the inertial force and the dynamic earth pressure do not reach peak values at the same time，and there is a phase difference between them；the distribution of the earth pressure along the wall height and its height of interaction point are similar to the M-O method and the S-W method respectively，and the test value is much smaller than the value calculated by the above methods；when the wall reaches a active state，the earth pressure at the end of reinforcements is negative，so the earth pressure is smaller than that without dynamic loading.

Key words： embankment engineering reinforced soil retaining wall dynamic loading dynamic earth pressure harmonic wave active state phase

引用本文:

徐鹏1，2，蒋关鲁1，2，任世杰1，廖丹2，王智猛3. 简谐波作用下加筋土挡墙动土压力模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(S2): 4283-4289.
XU Peng1，2，JIANG Guanlu1，2，REN Shijie1，LIAO Dan2，WANG Zhimeng3. Study on dynamic earth pressure of reinforced soil retaining walls under harmonic wave by model test. , 2018, 37(S2): 4283-4289.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0925 或 https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2018/V37/IS2/4283

[1]	KOSEKI J. Use of geosynthetics to improve seismic performance of earth structures[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2012，34(1)：51-68.
[2]	MONONOBE N，MATSUO H. On the determination of earth pressureduring earthquakes[C]// Proceedings of the World EngineeringConference. Tokyo，Japan：[s.n.]，1929：179-187.
[3]	OKABE S. General theory of earth pressure[J]. Journal of theJapanese Society of Civil Engineers，1926，12(1)：123-134.
[4]	SEED H，WHITMAN R. Design of earth retaining structures fordynamic loads[C]// ASCE Specialty Conference on Lateral Stresses inthe Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1970：103-147
[5]	AL ATIK L，SITAR N. Seismic earth pressures on cantilever retaining structures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2010，136(10)：1324-1333.
[6]	HUSHMAND A，DASHTI S，DAVIS C，et al. Seismic performance of underground reservoir structures：insight from centrifuge modeling on the influence of backfill soil type and geometry[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering，2016，142(11)：1-11
[7]	中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. TB10025—2006 铁路路基支结构设计规范[S]. 北京：中国铁道出版社，2006.(The ProfessionalStandards Compilation Group of People′s Republic of China.TB10025—2006 Code for design on retaining structures of railwaysubgrade[S]. Beijing：China Railway Publishing House，2006.(inChinese))
[8]	中交第二公路勘察设计研究院主编. JTGD30—2004公路路基设计规范[S]. 北京：人民交通出版社，2004.(CCCC Second HighwayConsultant Co.，Ltd.. JTG D30—1004 Code for design ofhighwaysubgrades[S]. Beijing：China Communications Press，2004.(inChinese))
[9]	AASHTO. AASHTO-LRFD Bridge design specification and commentary[S]. Washington D C：American Association ofState Highway and Transportation Officials，2014.
[10]	CEN. Eurocode 8：design of structures for earthquake resistance in：part 5：foundations，retaining structures and geotechnical aspects[S].Brussels：European Committeefor Standardization，2004.
[11]	HUANG C C，WANG W C. Seismic displacement of a geosynthetic-reinforced wall in the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nambu earthquake[J]. Soils and Foundations，2005，45(5)：1-10.
[12]	COLLINSJ G，CHOUERY-CURTIS V E，BERG R R. Fieldobservations of reinforced soil structures under seismicloading[C]// Earth Reinforcement Practice. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1992：223-228.
[13]	FUKUDA N，TAJIRI N，YAMANOUCHI T，et al. Applicability of seismic design methods to geogrid reinforced embankment[C]//Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotextiles，Geomembranes and Related Products.[S. l.]：[s. n.]，1994：533-536.
[14]	TATSUOKA F. Seismic stability against high seismic loads of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining structures，Keynote Lecture[C]//Proceedings of the6th InternationalConferenceon Geosynthetics. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，1998：103-142.
[15]	朱宏伟. 路基支挡结构地震动力响应及抗震设计改进技术研究[博士学位论文][D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2009.(ZHU Hongwei. Research on dynamic property under earthquake and seismic design improvement techniques of subgrade retaining structures[Ph. D. Thesis][D]. Chengdu：Southwest JiaotongUniversity，2009.(in Chinese))
[16]	杨长卫，张建经，陈强，等. 加筋重力式挡土墙抗震设计方法研究[J]. 土木工程学报，2015，48(8)：77-85.(YANG Changwei，ZHANG Jianjing，CHENQing，et al. Research on aseismic design of reinforced gravity retaining wall[J].ChinaCivil EngineeringJournal，2015，48(8)：77-85.(in Chinese))
[17]	王智猛，吴邵海，王海波，等. 一种砌块式面板加筋土挡墙[P]. 中国：CN 205617420 U，2016.10.05.(WANGZhimeng，WUShaohai，WANGHaibo，et al.A reinforced soil retaining wallwith block type panel[P]. China：CN 205617420 U，2016.10.05.(in Chinese))
[18]	林展展. 拼装面板返包式加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 成都：西南交通大学，2017.(LINZhanzhan.Experimentalstudy on shaking table test of wrap reinforced soil retaining wall with assembled panel[M. S.Thesis][D]. Chengdu：Southwest JiaotongUniversity，2017.(in Chinese))
[19]	YAZDANDOUST M. Investigation on the seismic performance of steel-strip reinforced-soil retaining walls using shaking table test[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering，2017，97：216-232.
[20]	YAZDANDOUST M. Seismic performance of soil-nailed walls using a 1gshaking table[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal，2017，55(1)：1-18.
[21]	SABERMAHANI M，GHALANDARZADEH A，FAKHER A. Experimental study on seismic deformation modes of reinforced-soil walls[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2009，27(2)：121-136.
[22]	PANAH A K，YAZDI M，GHALANDARZADEH A. Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2015，43(2)：148-161.
[23]	VISWANADHAM B V S，KÖNIG D. Studies on scaling and instrumentation of a geogrid[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes，2004，22(5)：307-328.
[24]	EL-EMAM M M，BATHURST R J. Facing contribution to seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil walls[J]. Geosynthetics International，2005，12(5)：215-238.
[25]	NAKAJIMA S. Study on seismic performance of geogrid reinforced soil retaining walls and deformation characteristics of backfill soil[C]// Proceedings of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics. Shanghai：[s. n.]，2008：211-215.
[1]	TATSUOKA F，HIRAKAWA D，NOJIRI M，et al. A new type of integral bridge comprising geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls[J]. Geosynthetics International，2009，16(4)：301-326.
[2]	HIGO Y，LEE C W，DOI T，et al. Study of dynamic stability of unsaturated embankments with different water contents by centrifugal model tests[J]. Soils and Foundations，2015，55(1)：112-126.
[3]	BHATTACHARJEE A，MURALI KRISHNA A. Development of numerical model of wrap-faced walls subjected to seismic excitation[J]. Geosynthetics International，2012，19(5)：354-369.
[4]	NAKAMURA S. Reexamination of Mononobe-Okabe theory of gravity retaining walls using centrifuge model tests[J]. Soils and foundations，2006，46(2)：135-146.
[5]	刘斯宏，高军军，王艳巧. 土工袋减振隔振机制分析及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学，2015，36(2)：325-332.(LIUSihong，GAO Junjun，WANG Yanqiao.Mechanism analysis and experimental study of vibrationreduction and isolation effect of geotextile bag[J]. Rockand Soil Mechanics，2015，36(2)：325-332.(inChinese))