基于传导、对流不同加热模式的油页岩孔隙结构变化的对比研究

doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0651

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1577 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要原位热解开采是未来油页岩开发的主流趋势，其原位加热方式主要分为传导和对流2种加热模式。在油页岩原位热解开采过程中，孔隙是油气渗流的主要通道，孔隙结构的连通特征直接影响和控制着热解油气的产出过程。为此，利用马弗炉和蒸汽锅炉对? 8 mm×25 mm的圆柱体油页岩试件分别实施传导和对流加热，最高加热温度均为550 ℃，并基于显微CT和3D数字岩芯重建技术对加热前后油页岩孔隙的大小、分布以及变化规律进行综合研究，分析不同加热模式对于油页岩的孔隙结构影响的差异及机制。研究表明：油页岩经传导加热后孔隙率为原始孔隙率的2.90倍，而经蒸汽对流加热后孔隙率为原始孔隙率的3.51倍。可见，与传导加热相比，对流加热使油页岩受热均匀，换热面积更大，使油页岩中固体有机质热解更充分，促使油页岩中的孔隙快速向四周拓展连通成大规模的孔隙连通团。另一方面，蒸汽对流加热能迅速携带走附着在孔隙壁上和滞留在“死端”孔隙中的残留页岩油，提高了孔隙间连通性，有效增大了孔隙直径，形成比传导加热连通性更好的孔隙结构，同时蒸汽携带油气一起产出，提高了油气的回收率。因此，对流加热为油页岩原位热解开采的首选加热模式，研究结果为实现大规模油页岩原位注蒸汽开发提供了有利技术支撑。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	康志勤1
	李翔1
	杨涛2
	赵静3
	赵阳升3
	杨栋1

关键词 ：岩石力学, 油页岩, 传导加热, 对流加热, 孔隙率, 显微CT, 3D数字岩芯

Abstract：In-situ pyrolysis is the mainstream trend of oil shale exploitation in the future. The in-situ heating methods are mainly divided into conduction and convection heating modes. In the process of in-situ pyrolysis of oil shale，the pores are the main channel for oil and gas seepage. The connection characteristics of the pore structure affect and control directly the production process of pyrolytic oil and gas. Therefore，in this paper，the cylindrical oil shale samples of ? 8 mm×25 mm are heated through conduction and convection with muffle furnace and steam boiler respectively. The maximum heating temperature is 550 ℃. With the micro-CT and 3D digital core reconstruction technology，the size，distribution and evolution of pores of oil shale before and after heating were studied comprehensively，and the differences of different heating modes on pore structure of oil shale were analyzed. The results show that the porosity is 2.90 times of the original porosity after the conduction heating. However，after the steam convection heating，the porosity is 3.51 times of the original porosity. The convection heating heats the oil shale evenly and the area of heat exchange is larger，so that the pyrolysis of the solid organic matter in the oil shale is more thoroughly，prompting the pores in the oil shale to expand rapidly and to connect into the large-scale connected pore groups. In addition，the convection heating steam quickly carries away the shale oil that adheres to the pore wall and remains in the dead-end of pores，which improves the connectivity between the pores and increases the pore diameter effectively and forms a better connected pore structure than in the conduction heating. The steam carries away oil and gas together simultaneously，which increases the recovery ratio of oil and gas. Therefore，convection heating is the preferred heating mode for in-situ pyrolysis of oil shale.

Key words： rock mechanics oil shale conduction heating convection heating porosity &mu CT 3D digital core

引用本文:

康志勤1，李翔1，杨涛2，赵静3，赵阳升3，杨栋1. 基于传导、对流不同加热模式的油页岩孔隙结构变化的对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(11): 2565-2575.
KANG Zhiqin1，LI Xiang1，YANG Tao2，ZHAO Jing3，ZHAO Yangsheng3，YANG Dong1. Comparisons of pore structures of oil shale upon conduction and convection heating. , 2018, 37(11): 2565-2575.

链接本文:

http://www.rockmech.org/CN/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0651 或 http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2018/V37/I11/2565

[3]	钱家麟，王剑秋，李术元. 世界油页岩资源利用和发展趋势[J]. 吉林大学学报，2006，36(6)：877-887.(QIAN Jialin，WANG Jianqiu，LI Shuyuan. World oil shale utilization and its future[J]. Journal of Jilin University，2006，36(6)：877-887.(in Chinese))
[6]	DYNI J R. Geology and resources of some world oil-shale deposits[J]. Oil Shale，2003，20(3)：193-252.
[4]	刘招君，董清水，叶松青，等. 中国油页岩资源现状[J]. 吉林大学学报，2006，36(6)：869-876.(LIU Zhaojun，DONG Qingshui，YE Songqing，et al. The situation of oil shale resources in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University，2006，36(6)：869-876.(in Chinese))
[13]	冯雪威，陈晨，陈大勇. 油页岩原位开采技术研究新进展[J]. 中国矿业，2011，20(6)：84-87.(FENG Xuewei，CHENG Chen，CHEN Dayong. New development of oil shale in-situ technology[J]. China Mining Magazine，2011，20(6)：84-87.(in Chinese))
[31]	NI X，MIAO J，LV R，et al. Quantitative 3D spatial characterization and flow simulation of coal macropores based on μCT technology[J]. Fuel，2017，200：199-207.
[2]	DYNI J R. Geology and resources of some world oil-shale deposits[J]. Oil Shale，2003，20(3)：193-252.
[11]	刘德勋，王红岩，郑德温，等. 世界油页岩原位开采技术进展[J]. 天然气工业，2009，(5)：128-132.(LIU Dexun，WANG Hongyan，ZHENG Dewen，et al. World progress of oil shale in-situ exploitation methods[J]. Natural Gas Industry，2009，(5)：128-132.(in Chinese))
[20]	SAIF T，LIN Q，BIJELJIC B，et al. Microstructural imaging and characterization of oil shale before and after pyrolysis[J]. Fuel，2017，197：562-574.
[1]	钱家麟，王剑秋，李术元. 世界油页岩综述[J]. 中国能源，2006，28(8)：16-19.(QIAN Jialin，WANG Jianqiu，LI Shuyuan. World oil shale[J]. Energy of China，2006，28(8)：16-19.(in Chinese))
[10]	ADAM R. BRANDT. Converting oil shale to liquid fuels with the Alberta Taciuk Processor：energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Energy and Fuels，2015，23(12)：6 253-6 258.
[19]	TIWARI P，DEO M，LIN C L，et al. Characterization of oil shale pore structure before and after pyrolysis by using X-ray micro CT[J]. Fuel，2013，107(9)：547-554.
[28]	YU Y，LIANG W，HU Y，et al. Study of micro-pores development in lean coal with temperature[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences，2012，51(4)：91-96.
[7]	SOONE J，DOILOV S. Sustainable utilization of oil shale resources and comparison of contemporary technologies used for oil shale processing[J]. Oil Shale，2003，20(3)：311-323.
[9]	AL-QODAH Z，SHAWAQFEH A T，LAFI W K. Adsorption of pesticides from aqueous solutions using oil shale ash[J]. Desalination，2007，208(1)：294-305.
[15]	HARFI K E，MOKHLISSE A，CHANÂA M B，et al. Pyrolysis of the Moroccan(Tarfaya) oil shales under microwave irradiation[J]. Fuel，2000，79(7)：733-742.
[16]	赵阳升，冯增朝，杨栋，等. 对流加热油页岩开采油气的方法[P]. 中国：ZL 200510012473，2005-4-20.(ZHAO Yangsheng，FENG Zengchao，YANG Dong，et al. Convection heating oil shale oil and gas extraction method[P]. China：ZL 200510012473，2005-4-20.(in Chinese))
[18]	KANG Z，YANG D，ZHAO Y，et al. Thermal cracking and corresponding permeability of Fushun oil shale[J]. Oil Shale，2011，28(2)：273-283.
[22]	康志勤，吕兆兴，杨栋，等. 油页岩原位注蒸汽开发的固-流-热-化学耦合数学模型研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报：自然科学版，2008，23(4)：30-34.(KANG Zhiqin，LÜ Zhaoxing，YANG Dong，et al. The solid-fluid-thermal-chemistry coupling mathematical model for oil shale in-situ steam injecting development[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University：Natural Science，2008，23(4)：30-34.(in Chinese))
[24]	YANIK J，YÜKSEL M，SA?LAM M，et al. Characterization of the oil fractions of shale oil obtained by pyrolysis and supercritical water extraction[J]. Fuel，1995，74(1)：46-50.
[25]	HARFI K E，BENNOUNA C，MOKHLISSE A，et al. Supercritical fluid extraction of Moroccan(Timahdit) oil shale with water[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis，1999，50(2)：163-174.
[27]	赵林. 过热蒸汽对流加热油页岩原位开采基础实验研究[硕士学位论文][D]. 太原：太原理工大学，2015.(ZHAO Lin. Experimental study on in-situ mining based overheat steam convection heating oil shale[M. S. Thesis][D]. Taiyuan：Taiyuan University of Technology，2015.(in Chinese))
[29]	SU X G，DU X J，YUAN H H，et al. Research of the thermal stability of structure of resin anchoring material based on 3D CT[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives，2016，68：161-168.
[5]	SUN Y，BAI F，LIU B，et al. Characterization of the oil shale products derived via topochemical reaction method[J]. Fuel，2014，115(1)：338-346.
[8]	钱家麟，尹亮，王剑秋，等. 油页岩：石油的补充能源[M]. 北京：中国石化出版社，2008：137-139.(QIAN Jialin，YIN Liang，WANG Jianqiu，et al. Oil shale-supplementary energy of petroleum[M]. Beijing：China Petrochemical Press，2008：137-139.(in Chinese))
[14]	FAN Y，DURLOFSKY L J，TCHELEPI H A. Numerical simulation of the in-situ upgrading of oil shale[J]. SPE Journal，2009，15(2)：368-381.
[23]	NAZZAL J M，WILLIAMS P T. Influence of temperature and steam on the products from the flash pyrolysis of Jordan oil shale[J]. International Journal of Energy Research，2002，26(14)：1 207-1 219.
[32]	康志勤，王玮，赵阳升，等. 基于显微CT技术的不同温度下油页岩孔隙结构三维逾渗规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报，2014，33(9)：1 837-1 842.(KANG Zhiqin，WEI Wei，ZHAO Yangsheng，et al. Three-dimensional percolation mechanism in oil shale under different temperatures based on micro-CT[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering，2014，33(9)：1 837-1 842.(in Chinese))
[12]	HARFI K E，MOKHLISSE A，CHANÂA M B，et al. Pyrolysis of the Moroccan(Tarfaya) oil shales under microwave irradiation[J]. Fuel，2000，79(7)：733-742.
[17]	BAI F，SUN Y，LIU Y，et al. Evaluation of the porous structure of Huadian oil shale during pyrolysis using multiple approaches[J]. Fuel，2017，187：1-8.
[26]	SUN Y，HE L，KANG S，et al. Pore evolution of oil shale during sub-critical water extraction[J]. Energies，2018，11(4)：842.
[21]	RABBANI A，BAYCHEV T G，AYATOLLAHI S，et al. Evolution of pore-scale morphology of oil shale during pyrolysis：a quantitative analysis[J]. Transport in Porous Media，2017，(4)：1-20.
[30]	ZHAO J，YANG D，KANG Z，et al. A micro-CT study of changes in the internal structure of Daqing and Yan'an oil shales at high temperatures[J]. Oil Shale，2012，29(4)：357.