The impact of slope unit scale and landslide sampling methods on regional landslide susceptibility assessment
YANG Zhongkang1，2，ZHANG Shishu1，DENG Jianhui2，LI Qingchun1，JI Haifeng1，ZHAO Siyuan2，ZHOU Xiaopeng2
(1. PowerChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited，Chengdu，Sichuan 610031，China；2. College of Water Resources and Hydropower，Sichuan University，Chengdu，Sichuan 610000，China)
Abstract：Recent advancements in the automatic extraction of slope units have been significant. However，research on the effective organization of landslide hazard data based on slope units remains limited，particularly regarding the impact of slope unit scales and landslide sampling methods on regional landslide susceptibility assessments. This study focuses on the Yuqu River Basin in southeastern Tibet，where six slope unit scales，ranging from fine to coarse，were defined by adjusting slope unit size parameters. Additionally，three landslide sampling methods-centroid-based，intersecting centroid-based，and area ratio threshold-based—were developed using landslide vector points and polygons. These approaches enabled the construction of 33 distinct datasets for evaluating landslide susceptibility. The results indicate that fine-scale slope units struggle to achieve high predictive accuracy，while overly coarse units reduce the rationality of susceptibility zoning，particularly through the overestimation of high-susceptibility areas. A moderate slope unit size can enhance the model?s predictive accuracy，leading to more reasonable partitioning results. This finding also validates the effectiveness of the principle of maximizing internal homogeneity and external heterogeneity of topography in landslide susceptibility assessments，providing robust support for the appropriate selection of slope unit sizes. Moreover，under complex environmental conditions，assigning the slope unit containing the landslide centroid as the sample proves to be a robust and rational method，enhancing both the predictive accuracy and zoning performance of the model. The variations in susceptibility assessment outcomes across different data organization strategies are primarily due to the effectiveness of the correlation between landslides and environmental factors，especially the distinctiveness between landslide and non-landslide scenarios. This study provides a valuable reference for landslide susceptibility modeling based on slope units in the alpine canyon regions of southeastern Tibet and significantly contributes to improving the quality of landslide risk assessments in complex environments.
[1] BROQUET M，CABRAL P，CAMPOS F S. What ecological factors to integrate in landslide susceptibility mapping?—An exploratory review of current trends in support of eco-DRR[J]. Progress in Disaster Science，2024，22：100328.
[2] HUANG F，XIONG H，JIANG S，et al. Modelling landslide susceptibility prediction：A review and construction of semi-supervised imbalanced theory[J]. Earth-Science Reviews，2024，250：104700.
[3] CAMILO D C，LOMBARDO L，MAI P M，et al. Handling high predictor dimensionality in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models through LASSO-penalized Generalized Linear Model[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software，2017，97：145–156.
[4] REICHENBACH P，ROSSI M，MALAMUD B D，et al. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models[J]. Earth-Science Reviews，2018，180：60–91.
[5] YUVARAJ R M，DOLUI B. Geographical assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical approach[J]. Quaternary Science Advances，2023，11：100097.
[6] LIAO M，WEN H，YANG L. Identifying the essential conditioning factors of landslide susceptibility models under different grid resolutions using hybrid machine learning：A case of Wushan and Wuxi counties，China[J]. Catena，2022，217：106428.
[7] ARNONE E，FRANCIPANE A，SCARBACI A，et al. Effect of raster resolution and polygon-conversion algorithm on landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software，2016，84：467–481.
[8] PALAMAKUMBURE D，FLENTJE P，STIRLING D. Consideration of optimal pixel resolution in deriving landslide susceptibility zoning within the Sydney Basin，New South Wales，Australia[J]. Computers and Geosciences，2015，82：13–22.
[9] AGBOOLA G，BENI L H，ELBAYOUMI T，et al. Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning and geospatial techniques[J]. Ecological Informatics，2024，81：102583.
[10] GUO Z，TIAN B，ZHU Y，et al. How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment? — A catchment-scale case study from China[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2024，16(3)：877–894.
[11] DOU J，YUNUS A P，MERGHADI A，et al. Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning[J]. Science of The Total Environment，2020，720：137320.
[12] ALVIOLI M，GUZZETTI F，MARCHESINI I. Parameter-free delineation of slope units and terrain subdivision of Italy[J]. Geomorphology，2020，358：107124.
[13] XIE M，ESAKI T，ZHOU G. GIS-based probabilistic mapping of landslide hazard using a three-dimensional deterministic model[J]. Natural Hazards，2004，33(2)：265–282.
[14] 颜 阁，梁收运，赵红亮. 基于GIS的斜坡单元划分方法改进与实现[J]. 地理科学，2017，37(11)：7.(YAN Ge，LIANG Shouyun，ZHAO Hongliang. Improvement and implementation of slope unit division method based on GIS[J]. Geographical Science，2017，37(11)：7.(in Chinese))
[15] ALVIOLI M，MARCHESINI M，REICHENBACH P，et al. Automatic delineation of geomorphological slope units with r.slopeunits v1.0 and their optimization for landslide susceptibility modeling[J]. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions，2016，9(11)：3 975.
[16] WANG K，ZHANG S，DELGADOTELLEZ R，et al. A new slope unit extraction method for regional landslide analysis based on morphological image analysis[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment，2019，78(6)：4 139–4 151.
[17] HUANG F，CHEN L，YIN K，et al. Object-oriented change detection and damage assessment using high-resolution remote sensing images，Tangjiao Landslide，Three Gorges Reservoir，China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences，2018，77(5)：181–183.
[18] LIN S，WANG X，NAN C. Slope unit-based genetic landform mapping on Tibetan plateau- a terrain unit-based framework for large spatial scale landform classification[J]. CATENA，2024，236：107757.
[19] BA Q Q，CHEN Y M，DENG S S，et al. A comparison of slope units and grid cells as mapping units for landslide susceptibility assessment[J]. Earth Science Informatics，2018，11：373–388.
[20] YANG Z，WEI J，DENG J，et al. An improved method for the evaluation and local multi-scale optimization of the automatic extraction of slope units in complex terrains：remote sensing[J]. Remote Sensing，2022，14(14)：3 444.
[21] GUO Z，TIAN B，ZHU Y，et al. How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment? — A catchment-scale case study from China[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2024，16(3)：877–894.
[22] LIMA P，STEGER S，GLADE T，et al. Conventional data-driven landslide susceptibility models may only tell us half of the story： Potential underestimation of landslide impact areas depending on the modeling design[J]. Geomorphology，2023，430：108638.
[23] LEE J，SAMEEN M I，PRADHAN B，et al. Modeling landslide susceptibility in data-scarce environments using optimized data mining and statistical methods[J]. Geomorphology，2018，303：284–298.
[24] 戴福初，邓建辉. 青藏高原东南三江流域滑坡灾害发育特征[J]. 四川大学学报：工程科学版，2020，52(5)：1–15.(DAI Fuchu，DENG Jianhui. Characteristics of landslide development in the three rivers basin of the Southeastern Qinghai—Tibet plateau[J]. Journal of Sichuan University：Engineering Science Edition，2020，52(5)：1–15.in Chinese))
[25] ZHAO S，DAI F，DENG J，et al. Insights into landslide development and susceptibility in extremely complex alpine geoenvironments along the western Sichuan–Tibet Engineering Corridor，China[J]. Catena，2023，227：107105.
[26] QIN Y，ZHANG D，ZHENG W，et al. Spatial distribution of near-fault landslides along Litang fault zones，eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geomorphology，2024，455：109189.
[27] SUN X，CHEN J，HAN X，et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping along the upper Jinsha River，South-Western China：a comparison of hydrological and curvature watershed methods for slope unit classification[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment，2020，79(11)：4 657–4 670.
[28] HONG H，WANG D，ZHU A，et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on the reliability of landslide and non-landslide sample[J]. Expert Systems with Applications，2024，243：122933.
[29] CHANG Z，HUANG J，HUANG F，et al. Uncertainty analysis of non-landslide sample selection in landslide susceptibility prediction using slope unit-based machine learning models[J]. Gondwana Research，2023，117：307–320.
[30] HUANG F，MAO D，JIANG S，et al. Uncertainties in landslide susceptibility prediction modeling：A review on the incompleteness of landslide inventory and its influence rules[J]. Geoscience Frontiers，2024，15(6)：101886.
2025, Vol. 44 
