斜坡单元尺寸和滑坡取样方式对区域滑坡易发性评价的影响

doi:10.3724/1000-6915.jrme.2024.0410

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (13025 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要近年来，斜坡单元自动提取技术取得了显著进展，但基于斜坡单元划分成果进行滑坡孕灾数据空间组织的研究仍显不足，尤其是斜坡单元尺寸和滑坡取样方式对区域滑坡易发性评价的影响尚不明确。以藏东南玉曲流域为研究对象，通过控制斜坡单元尺寸参数设置6种从精细到粗糙的评价单元尺寸，并基于滑坡矢量点和矢量多边形设计基于质心、基于相交质心和基于面积比阈值的3种滑坡取样方式，构建33组基于不同空间数据组织策略的滑坡-孕灾因子数据集，以进行滑坡易发性评价。研究结果表明，精细的斜坡单元尺寸难以获得较高的预测准确率，而粗糙的尺寸会导致易发性分区的合理性下降，尤其表现为区域滑坡易发性的过高估计。适中的斜坡单元尺寸能够提高模型的预测准确率，并实现更为科学合理的分区结果。该发现也验证了地形最大内部同质性与外部异质性原则在滑坡易发性评价中的有效性，进而为斜坡单元尺寸的适当选择提供了有力支持。此外，在复杂孕灾场景下，将滑坡质心所在的斜坡单元取样为滑坡标签是一种稳健合理的数据空间组织方式，有助于提升模型的预测准确率和分区表现。不同数据提取与分配策略下易发性评价结果的差异，主要源于滑坡与孕灾因子之间关联性的表达效果，尤其是滑坡与非滑坡场景信息能否被明确差异化和对立性呈现。该研究为藏东南高山峡谷地区基于斜坡单元的滑坡易发性建模与评价提供了有效参考，对复杂孕灾环境下滑坡风险评价结果的质量提升具有重要意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨仲康1
	2
	张世殊1
	邓建辉2
	李青春1
	纪海锋1
	赵思远2
	周小棚2

关键词 ：边坡工程, 区域滑坡易发性评价, 斜坡单元尺寸, 滑坡取样方式, 影响效应, 形成原因

Abstract：Recent advancements in the automatic extraction of slope units have been significant. However，research on the effective organization of landslide hazard data based on slope units remains limited，particularly regarding the impact of slope unit scales and landslide sampling methods on regional landslide susceptibility assessments. This study focuses on the Yuqu River Basin in southeastern Tibet，where six slope unit scales，ranging from fine to coarse，were defined by adjusting slope unit size parameters. Additionally，three landslide sampling methods-centroid-based，intersecting centroid-based，and area ratio threshold-based—were developed using landslide vector points and polygons. These approaches enabled the construction of 33 distinct datasets for evaluating landslide susceptibility. The results indicate that fine-scale slope units struggle to achieve high predictive accuracy，while overly coarse units reduce the rationality of susceptibility zoning，particularly through the overestimation of high-susceptibility areas. A moderate slope unit size can enhance the model?s predictive accuracy，leading to more reasonable partitioning results. This finding also validates the effectiveness of the principle of maximizing internal homogeneity and external heterogeneity of topography in landslide susceptibility assessments，providing robust support for the appropriate selection of slope unit sizes. Moreover，under complex environmental conditions，assigning the slope unit containing the landslide centroid as the sample proves to be a robust and rational method，enhancing both the predictive accuracy and zoning performance of the model. The variations in susceptibility assessment outcomes across different data organization strategies are primarily due to the effectiveness of the correlation between landslides and environmental factors，especially the distinctiveness between landslide and non-landslide scenarios. This study provides a valuable reference for landslide susceptibility modeling based on slope units in the alpine canyon regions of southeastern Tibet and significantly contributes to improving the quality of landslide risk assessments in complex environments.

Key words： slope engineering regional landslide susceptibility assessment slope unit scale landslide sampling method impact effect causal factors

引用本文:

杨仲康1，2，张世殊1，邓建辉2，李青春1，纪海锋1，赵思远2，周小棚2. 斜坡单元尺寸和滑坡取样方式对区域滑坡易发性评价的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2025, 44(3): 602-617.
YANG Zhongkang1，2，ZHANG Shishu1，DENG Jianhui2，LI Qingchun1，JI Haifeng1，ZHAO Siyuan2，ZHOU Xiaopeng2. The impact of slope unit scale and landslide sampling methods on regional landslide susceptibility assessment. , 2025, 44(3): 602-617.

链接本文:

https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/10.3724/1000-6915.jrme.2024.0410 或 https://rockmech.whrsm.ac.cn/CN/Y2025/V44/I3/602

[1]	BROQUET M，CABRAL P，CAMPOS F S. What ecological factors to integrate in landslide susceptibility mapping?—An exploratory review of current trends in support of eco-DRR[J]. Progress in Disaster Science，2024，22：100328.
[2]	HUANG F，XIONG H，JIANG S，et al. Modelling landslide susceptibility prediction：A review and construction of semi-supervised imbalanced theory[J]. Earth-Science Reviews，2024，250：104700.
[3]	CAMILO D C，LOMBARDO L，MAI P M，et al. Handling high predictor dimensionality in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models through LASSO-penalized Generalized Linear Model[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software，2017，97：145-156.
[4]	REICHENBACH P，ROSSI M，MALAMUD B D，et al. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models[J]. Earth-Science Reviews，2018，180：60-91.
[5]	YUVARAJ R M，DOLUI B. Geographical assessment of landslide susceptibility using statistical approach[J]. Quaternary Science Advances，2023，11：100097.
[6]	LIAO M，WEN H，YANG L. Identifying the essential conditioning factors of landslide susceptibility models under different grid resolutions using hybrid machine learning：A case of Wushan and Wuxi counties，China[J]. Catena，2022，217：106428.
[7]	ARNONE E，FRANCIPANE A，SCARBACI A，et al. Effect of raster resolution and polygon-conversion algorithm on landslide susceptibility mapping[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software，2016，84：467-481.
[8]	PALAMAKUMBURE D，FLENTJE P，STIRLING D. Consideration of optimal pixel resolution in deriving landslide susceptibility zoning within the Sydney Basin，New South Wales，Australia[J]. Computers and Geosciences，2015，82：13-22.
[9]	AGBOOLA G，BENI L H，ELBAYOUMI T，et al. Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning and geospatial techniques[J]. Ecological Informatics，2024，81：102583.
[10]	GUO Z，TIAN B，ZHU Y，et al. How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment? — A catchment-scale case study from China[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2024，16(3)：877-894.
[11]	DOU J，YUNUS A P，MERGHADI A，et al. Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning[J]. Science of The Total Environment，2020，720：137320.
[12]	ALVIOLI M，GUZZETTI F，MARCHESINI I. Parameter-free delineation of slope units and terrain subdivision of Italy[J]. Geomorphology，2020，358：107124.
[13]	XIE M，ESAKI T，ZHOU G. GIS-based probabilistic mapping of landslide hazard using a three-dimensional deterministic model[J]. Natural Hazards，2004，33(2)：265-282.
[14]	颜阁，梁收运，赵红亮. 基于GIS的斜坡单元划分方法改进与实现[J]. 地理科学，2017，37(11)：7.(YAN Ge，LIANG Shouyun，ZHAO Hongliang. Improvement and implementation of slope unit division method based on GIS[J]. Geographical Science，2017，37(11)：7.(in Chinese))
[15]	ALVIOLI M，MARCHESINI M，REICHENBACH P，et al. Automatic delineation of geomorphological slope units with r.slopeunits v1.0 and their optimization for landslide susceptibility modeling[J]. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions，2016，9(11)：3 975.
[16]	WANG K，ZHANG S，DELGADOTELLEZ R，et al. A new slope unit extraction method for regional landslide analysis based on morphological image analysis[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment，2019，78(6)：4 139-4 151.
[17]	HUANG F，CHEN L，YIN K，et al. Object-oriented change detection and damage assessment using high-resolution remote sensing images，Tangjiao Landslide，Three Gorges Reservoir，China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences，2018，77(5)：181-183.
[18]	LIN S，WANG X，NAN C. Slope unit-based genetic landform mapping on Tibetan plateau- a terrain unit-based framework for large spatial scale landform classification[J]. CATENA，2024，236：107757.
[19]	BA Q Q，CHEN Y M，DENG S S，et al. A comparison of slope units and grid cells as mapping units for landslide susceptibility assessment[J]. Earth Science Informatics，2018，11：373-388.
[20]	YANG Z，WEI J，DENG J，et al. An improved method for the evaluation and local multi-scale optimization of the automatic extraction of slope units in complex terrains：remote sensing[J]. Remote Sensing，2022，14(14)：3 444.
[21]	GUO Z，TIAN B，ZHU Y，et al. How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment? — A catchment-scale case study from China[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering，2024，16(3)：877-894.
[22]	LIMA P，STEGER S，GLADE T，et al. Conventional data-driven landslide susceptibility models may only tell us half of the story： Potential underestimation of landslide impact areas depending on the modeling design[J]. Geomorphology，2023，430：108638.
[23]	LEE J，SAMEEN M I，PRADHAN B，et al. Modeling landslide susceptibility in data-scarce environments using optimized data mining and statistical methods[J]. Geomorphology，2018，303：284-298.
[24]	戴福初，邓建辉. 青藏高原东南三江流域滑坡灾害发育特征[J]. 四川大学学报：工程科学版，2020，52(5)：1-15.(DAI Fuchu，DENG Jianhui. Characteristics of landslide development in the three rivers basin of the Southeastern Qinghai—Tibet plateau[J]. Journal of Sichuan University：Engineering Science Edition，2020，52(5)：1-15.in Chinese))
[25]	ZHAO S，DAI F，DENG J，et al. Insights into landslide development and susceptibility in extremely complex alpine geoenvironments along the western Sichuan-Tibet Engineering Corridor，China[J]. Catena，2023，227：107105.
[26]	QIN Y，ZHANG D，ZHENG W，et al. Spatial distribution of near-fault landslides along Litang fault zones，eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geomorphology，2024，455：109189.
[27]	SUN X，CHEN J，HAN X，et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping along the upper Jinsha River，South-Western China：a comparison of hydrological and curvature watershed methods for slope unit classification[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment，2020，79(11)：4 657-4 670.
[28]	HONG H，WANG D，ZHU A，et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on the reliability of landslide and non-landslide sample[J]. Expert Systems with Applications，2024，243：122933.
[29]	CHANG Z，HUANG J，HUANG F，et al. Uncertainty analysis of non-landslide sample selection in landslide susceptibility prediction using slope unit-based machine learning models[J]. Gondwana Research，2023，117：307-320.
[30]	HUANG F，MAO D，JIANG S，et al. Uncertainties in landslide susceptibility prediction modeling：A review on the incompleteness of landslide inventory and its influence rules[J]. Geoscience Frontiers，2024，15(6)：101886.